Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Interviewer.AI
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
Gloat and Interviewer.AI tie at 47.
Gloat, filed under Sourcing, and Interviewer.AI, filed under Video interview, tie at 47 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Gloat leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Interviewer.AI 3, yet the two totals land on the same number. Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Gloat 42, Interviewer.AI 32 — and at a 12% weight it carries 52% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat4
- Interviewer.AI3
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring42 vs 32
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Post-Market Monitoring12% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Interviewer.AI under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Interviewer.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight27% of the movement so far
Gloat42Interviewer.AI321.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight51% of the movement so far
Gloat28Interviewer.AI351.1 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight69% of the movement so far
Gloat48Interviewer.AI520.8 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 4
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight81% of the movement so far
Gloat38Interviewer.AI350.5 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight88% of the movement so far
Gloat62Interviewer.AI580.3 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight95% of the movement so far
Gloat58Interviewer.AI600.3 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62Interviewer.AI600.2 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Interviewer.AI, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Interviewer.AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 52 | -4 | -0.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 35 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 32 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 58 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 47F | - | +0.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Interviewer.AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.