Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs JobDiva
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Gloat leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Gloat (Sourcing) opens an 18-point lead on JobDiva (ATS-integrated), 47 to 29. JobDiva leads none of the 7 criteria, and Gloat is ahead on 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Gloat 38, JobDiva 15, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 23% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat7
- JobDiva0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency38 vs 15
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2003 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight23% of the movement so far
Gloat38JobDiva154.1 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight46% of the movement so far
Gloat48JobDiva284.0 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight63% of the movement so far
Gloat58JobDiva383.0 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight78% of the movement so far
Gloat62JobDiva402.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight87% of the movement so far
Gloat62JobDiva421.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight95% of the movement so far
Gloat42JobDiva301.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat28JobDiva220.9 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +17.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +18 beside that +17.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus JobDiva, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 28 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 15 | +23 | +4.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 22 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 38 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 40 | +22 | +2.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 30 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 42 | +20 | +1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 29F | +18 | +17.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.