Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Keka
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Keka
Keka is an HR and payroll suite whose Keka Hire ATS scores each applicant against recruiter-defined role requirements and runs an AI screening conversation that decides which candidates reach the shortlist.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Gloat leads Keka by 10 points.
Gloat sits 10 points above Keka under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 37 — with Gloat filed under Sourcing and Keka under ATS-integrated. Gloat leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Keka leads 1, including FRIA Support. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Gloat 48, Keka 30, 20% weight), is only 35% of the weighted advantage Gloat builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat6
- Keka1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation48 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Keka under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Keka |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight34% of the movement so far
Gloat48Keka303.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight65% of the movement so far
Gloat38Keka203.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight78% of the movement so far
Gloat62Keka501.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight90% of the movement so far
Gloat58Keka501.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight95% of the movement so far
Gloat62Keka550.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Gloat28Keka300.3 weighted points to Keka
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat42Keka400.2 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +10.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Keka, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Keka | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 30 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 20 | +18 | +3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 50 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 55 | +7 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 37F | +10 | +10.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Keka | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Keka has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Keka, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Keka last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.