Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Maki People
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
Concerning
Assessment
The result
Maki People leads Gloat on all 7 criteria.
Maki People finishes 20 points clear of Gloat under rubric v1.0 — 67 (D) against 47 (F) — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Of the 7 criteria Gloat wins none, and the narrowest lead Maki People holds is on Human Oversight Design, Gloat 62 to Maki People 66. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Gloat 38, Maki People 80, 18% weight), is only 38% of the weighted advantage Maki People builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat0
- Maki People7
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency38 vs 80
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | FR |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight38% of the movement so far
Gloat38Maki People807.6 weighted points to Maki People
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight64% of the movement so far
Gloat28Maki People625.1 weighted points to Maki People
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight80% of the movement so far
Gloat48Maki People643.2 weighted points to Maki People
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight88% of the movement so far
Gloat42Maki People551.6 weighted points to Maki People
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight93% of the movement so far
Gloat62Maki People741.0 weighted points to Maki People
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Gloat58Maki People640.9 weighted points to Maki People
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62Maki People660.5 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -19.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Maki People, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 64 | -16 | -3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 80 | -42 | -7.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 62 | -34 | -5.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 66 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 74 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 67D | -20 | -19.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.