Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs PageUp
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
The result
PageUp leads Gloat on all 7 criteria.
PageUp finishes 17 points clear of Gloat under rubric v1.0 — 64 (D) against 47 (F) — across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Of the 7 criteria Gloat wins none, and the narrowest lead PageUp holds is on Customer Documentation, Gloat 62 to PageUp 63. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Gloat 38, PageUp 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 44% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat0
- PageUp7
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency38 vs 80
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2015 | 1997 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight44% of the movement so far
Gloat38PageUp807.6 weighted points to PageUp
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight74% of the movement so far
Gloat48PageUp745.2 weighted points to PageUp
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight85% of the movement so far
Gloat28PageUp401.8 weighted points to PageUp
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight94% of the movement so far
Gloat42PageUp551.6 weighted points to PageUp
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Gloat58PageUp630.8 weighted points to PageUp
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62PageUp640.2 weighted points to PageUp
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62PageUp630.1 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -17.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus PageUp, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 74 | -26 | -5.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 80 | -42 | -7.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 40 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 63 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 64 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 63 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 64D | -17 | -17.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.