Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Pinpoint
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Pinpoint leads Gloat on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint, filed under Screening, comes out 10 points above Gloat, filed under Sourcing: 57 against 47 under rubric v1.0. Pinpoint leads every one of the 7 criteria, Gloat none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Gloat 62 to Pinpoint 64. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Gloat 48, Pinpoint 72 — and at a 20% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat0
- Pinpoint7
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation48 vs 72
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pinpoint under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | JE |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight47% of the movement so far
Gloat48Pinpoint724.8 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight61% of the movement so far
Gloat28Pinpoint381.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight76% of the movement so far
Gloat58Pinpoint681.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight88% of the movement so far
Gloat42Pinpoint521.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 5
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight95% of the movement so far
Gloat38Pinpoint420.7 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight98% of the movement so far
Gloat62Pinpoint660.3 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62Pinpoint640.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -10.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Pinpoint, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 72 | -24 | -4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 42 | -4 | -0.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 68 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 64 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 52 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 66 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 57F | -10 | -10.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.