Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs The Predictive Index
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The Predictive Index
The Predictive Index provides validated behavioral and cognitive psychometric assessments used to screen, hire, and develop employees and design teams, alongside AI-assisted talent-management software.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates The Predictive Index and Gloat.
The Predictive Index (Assessment) edges Gloat (Sourcing) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 48 to 47. The Predictive Index leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Gloat leads 3, including Human Oversight Design. Bias Audit Transparency, at 18%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to The Predictive Index (Gloat 38, The Predictive Index 45), 45% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Human Oversight Design, Gloat 62 to The Predictive Index 52.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat3
- The Predictive Index4
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design62 vs 52
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, The Predictive Index under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | The Predictive Index |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 1955 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight27% of the movement so far
Gloat38The Predictive Index451.3 weighted points to The Predictive Index
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight53% of the movement so far
Gloat62The Predictive Index521.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight76% of the movement so far
Gloat28The Predictive Index351.1 weighted points to The Predictive Index
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight85% of the movement so far
Gloat58The Predictive Index550.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight94% of the movement so far
Gloat48The Predictive Index500.4 weighted points to The Predictive Index
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight97% of the movement so far
Gloat62The Predictive Index600.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat42The Predictive Index430.1 weighted points to The Predictive Index
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus The Predictive Index, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | The Predictive Index | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 45 | -7 | -1.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 52 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 43 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 48F | -1 | -1.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | The Predictive Index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; The Predictive Index has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 24 for The Predictive Index, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- The Predictive Index last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.