The result

Gloat leads Radancy on 5 of the 7 criteria.

Gloat scores 47 and Radancy 41 under rubric v1.0 — a 6-point gap inside the Sourcing cohort. Gloat leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so Radancy is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 Gloat leads is Customer Documentation, Gloat 62 to Radancy 60. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Gloat 38, Radancy 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 55% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 5 criteria it leads.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Gloat5
  • Radancy0
  • Level2
Widest raw gap
Bias Audit Transparency38 vs 20
Heaviest weighted swing
Bias Audit Transparency18% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Gloat and Radancy are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

RecordGloatRadancy
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20152006

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight55% of the movement so far

    Gloat38
    Radancy20

    3.2 weighted points to Gloat

  2. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight75% of the movement so far

    Gloat48
    Radancy42

    1.2 weighted points to Gloat

  3. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight87% of the movement so far

    Gloat42
    Radancy36

    0.7 weighted points to Gloat

  4. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight97% of the movement so far

    Gloat62
    Radancy57

    0.6 weighted points to Gloat

  5. Customer Documentation

    8% weight100% of the movement so far

    Gloat62
    Radancy60

    0.2 weighted points to Gloat

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +5.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +5.9.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Gloat minus Radancy, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightGloatRadancyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4842+6+1.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%3820+18+3.2
FRIA Support15%2828--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5858--
Human Oversight Design12%6257+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4236+6+0.7
Customer Documentation8%6260+2+0.2
Total100%47F41F+6+5.9

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightGloatRadancy
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%22Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%218Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain166Sources on the vendor's own domain

Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Radancy has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for Radancy, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Gloat last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Radancy last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next