Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Retorio
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Retorio
Video-based AI that analyses words, voice, and facial expression/body language to infer Big Five (OCEAN) personality and behavioural traits.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
3 points separate Gloat and Retorio.
Gloat (Sourcing) edges Retorio (Assessment) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 47 to 44. The 7 criteria split 4 to 3 in favour of Gloat: Gloat is ahead on Human Oversight Design and Retorio on Article 11 Technical Documentation. Customer Documentation is the widest raw gap (Gloat 62, Retorio 50) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Human Oversight Design at 12% (Gloat 62, Retorio 52), 29% of the weighted advantage Gloat builds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat4
- Retorio3
- Widest raw gap
- Customer Documentation62 vs 50
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Human Oversight Design12% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Retorio under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Retorio |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | DE |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Human Oversight Design
12% weight23% of the movement so far
Gloat62Retorio521.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight44% of the movement so far
Gloat42Retorio331.1 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight62% of the movement so far
Gloat62Retorio501.0 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight80% of the movement so far
Gloat58Retorio520.9 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight87% of the movement so far
Gloat48Retorio500.4 weighted points to Retorio
- 6
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight94% of the movement so far
Gloat38Retorio400.4 weighted points to Retorio
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat28Retorio300.3 weighted points to Retorio
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Retorio, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Retorio | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 52 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 33 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 50 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 44F | +3 | +3.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Retorio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 16 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Retorio has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Retorio sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for Retorio, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Retorio last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.