Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Toggl Hire
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
Gloat leads Toggl Hire by 10 points.
Gloat sits 10 points above Toggl Hire under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 37 — with Gloat filed under Sourcing and Toggl Hire under Assessment. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Gloat: Gloat is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Toggl Hire on FRIA Support. The advantage Gloat holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Gloat 48, Toggl Hire 30, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 35% of the weighted points Gloat gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat6
- Toggl Hire1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation48 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Toggl Hire under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | EE |
| Founded | 2015 | 2013 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight34% of the movement so far
Gloat48Toggl Hire303.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight65% of the movement so far
Gloat38Toggl Hire203.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight76% of the movement so far
Gloat62Toggl Hire521.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight85% of the movement so far
Gloat62Toggl Hire501.0 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight93% of the movement so far
Gloat42Toggl Hire350.8 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight97% of the movement so far
Gloat58Toggl Hire550.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat28Toggl Hire300.3 weighted points to Toggl Hire
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +10.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Toggl Hire, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 30 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 20 | +18 | +3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 52 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 50 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 37F | +10 | +10.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.