Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Turing
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
Gloat leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
Gloat, filed under Sourcing, comes out 11 points above Turing, filed under Assessment: 47 against 36 under rubric v1.0. Gloat takes all 7 criteria from Turing without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is FRIA Support, Gloat 28 to Turing 25. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Human Oversight Design (Gloat 62, Turing 45) and Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (Gloat 58, Turing 44), the second being 20% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat7
- Turing0
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design62 vs 45
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data Governance Disclosure15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Turing under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight20% of the movement so far
Gloat58Turing442.1 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight39% of the movement so far
Gloat62Turing452.0 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight57% of the movement so far
Gloat38Turing281.8 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight74% of the movement so far
Gloat42Turing271.8 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight85% of the movement so far
Gloat48Turing421.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight96% of the movement so far
Gloat62Turing481.1 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat28Turing250.4 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +10.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Turing, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 42 | +6 | +1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 28 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 44 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 45 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 27 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 48 | +14 | +1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 36F | +11 | +10.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.