Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Vervoe
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Vervoe
AI-powered skills-assessment platform that grades and ranks candidates on performance in role-specific, task-based assessments.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates Gloat and Vervoe.
Gloat holds a 1-point edge over Vervoe under rubric v1.0, 47 to 46, across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. Vervoe takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 6 for Gloat, whose share includes Post-Market Monitoring. Bias Audit Transparency is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Vervoe — Gloat 38, Vervoe 52, on an 18% weight — which is 100% of the weighted advantage Vervoe holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat6
- Vervoe1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency38 vs 52
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Vervoe under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Vervoe |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight40% of the movement so far
Gloat38Vervoe522.5 weighted points to Vervoe
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight67% of the movement so far
Gloat42Vervoe281.7 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight77% of the movement so far
Gloat48Vervoe450.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight84% of the movement so far
Gloat28Vervoe250.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight91% of the movement so far
Gloat58Vervoe550.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight96% of the movement so far
Gloat62Vervoe580.3 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62Vervoe600.2 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Vervoe, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Vervoe | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 45 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -2.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 28 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 58 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 46F | +1 | +1.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Vervoe | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Vervoe has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Vervoe, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Vervoe last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.