Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs Jobma
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Jobma.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Jobma | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 55 | +23 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 40 | +46 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 35 | +7 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 56 | +8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 60 | +6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 44 | +14 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 62 | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 49 (F) | +18 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Greenhouse
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- public statement
- 3
- audit report
- 2
- absence
- 1
Evidence count
Jobma
21 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 13
- absence
- 4
- public statement
- 4