§ The result
Greenhouse leads Jobma on all 7 criteria.
Greenhouse finishes 18 points clear of Jobma under rubric v1.0 — 67 (D) against 49 (F) — across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Greenhouse leads every one of the 7 criteria, Jobma none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Customer Documentation, Greenhouse 64 to Jobma 62. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Greenhouse 86, Jobma 40 — and at an 18% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
§ The record
Greenhouse is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Jobma under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Jobma is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Greenhouse | Jobma |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Greenhouse 86 · Jobma 40
8.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
20% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Greenhouse 78 · Jobma 55
4.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Greenhouse 58 · Jobma 44
1.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Greenhouse 64 · Jobma 56
1.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Greenhouse 42 · Jobma 35
1.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Greenhouse 66 · Jobma 60
0.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Greenhouse 64 · Jobma 62
0.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +17.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +18 beside that +17.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Jobma.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Jobma | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 55 | +23 | +4.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 40 | +46 | +8.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 56 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 60 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 44 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 62 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 49 (F) | +18 | +17.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | Jobma | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 17 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Jobma has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 21 for Jobma, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobma last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next