Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs myInterview
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
Greenhouse leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.
Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) and myInterview (Video interview) are 30 points apart under rubric v1.0, 67 (D) for Greenhouse against 37 (F) for myInterview. myInterview leads none of the 7 criteria, and Greenhouse is ahead on 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Greenhouse 86, myInterview 35, 18% weight), is only 30% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse7
- myInterview0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency86 vs 35
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse is filed under ATS-integrated AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only myInterview is in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight30% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86myInterview359.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight57% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78myInterview388.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight68% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64myInterview423.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight78% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58myInterview333.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight86% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42myInterview252.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight94% of the movement so far
Greenhouse66myInterview482.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64myInterview401.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +30.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 30.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +30 beside that +30.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus myInterview, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 38 | +40 | +8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 35 | +51 | +9.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 42 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 48 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 33 | +25 | +3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 40 | +24 | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 37F | +30 | +30.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse and myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 30 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.