Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs Rippling
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
Rippling
Rippling Recruiting is an applicant tracking system within Rippling's all-in-one HR/IT/finance platform that uses AI to review and screen job applications, summarize interviewer feedback, transcribe video interviews, flag application fraud, and automate interview scheduling.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Greenhouse leads Rippling by 11 points.
Rubric v1.0 scores the ATS-integrated entries Greenhouse and Rippling at 67 (D) and 56 (F), a gap of 11 points. Rippling takes 1 of the 7 criteria, FRIA Support among them, against 4 for Greenhouse, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 2 are level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Greenhouse 86, Rippling 42 — and at an 18% weight it carries 72% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse4
- Rippling1
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency86 vs 42
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse and Rippling are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of
Only Greenhouse is in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | Rippling |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | High |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2016 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight69% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86Rippling427.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight81% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58Rippling471.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight90% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78Rippling731.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight96% of the movement so far
Greenhouse66Rippling600.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42Rippling450.4 weighted points to Rippling
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +10.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +10.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Rippling, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Rippling | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 73 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 42 | +44 | +7.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 45 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 64 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 60 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 47 | +11 | +1.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 64 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 56F | +11 | +10.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | Rippling | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Rippling has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 30 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 13 for Rippling, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Rippling last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.