Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
hackajob vs HeroHunt.ai
hackajob
Archer, hackajob's AI sourcing agent, is calibrated by a recruiter on a hiring brief, then finds, engages and qualifies passive candidates from a 1.5m-member pool and 800m+ indexed profiles and invites those who meet the bar to apply through the employer's existing ATS.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
hackajob leads HeroHunt.ai on 6 of the 7 criteria.
The Sourcing cohort pairing of hackajob and HeroHunt.ai comes out 45 to 30 under rubric v1.0, a 15-point lead for hackajob. hackajob leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so HeroHunt.ai is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 hackajob leads is FRIA Support, hackajob 32 to HeroHunt.ai 27. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (hackajob 60, HeroHunt.ai 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 55% of the weighted advantage hackajob holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- hackajob6
- HeroHunt.ai0
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation60 vs 20
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
hackajob and HeroHunt.ai are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | hackajob | HeroHunt.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | NL |
| Founded | 2014 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight55% of the movement so far
hackajob60HeroHunt.ai208.0 weighted points to hackajob
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight68% of the movement so far
hackajob58HeroHunt.ai451.9 weighted points to hackajob
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight80% of the movement so far
hackajob20HeroHunt.ai101.8 weighted points to hackajob
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight88% of the movement so far
hackajob38HeroHunt.ai281.2 weighted points to hackajob
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight95% of the movement so far
hackajob60HeroHunt.ai481.0 weighted points to hackajob
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
hackajob32HeroHunt.ai270.8 weighted points to hackajob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +14.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +15 beside that +14.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hackajob minus HeroHunt.ai, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | hackajob | HeroHunt.ai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 20 | +40 | +8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 10 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 27 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 45 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 28 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 45F | 30F | +15 | +14.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hackajob | HeroHunt.ai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 74 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hackajob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against