Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
hackajob vs HeyMilo
hackajob
Archer, hackajob's AI sourcing agent, is calibrated by a recruiter on a hiring brief, then finds, engages and qualifies passive candidates from a 1.5m-member pool and 800m+ indexed profiles and invites those who meet the bar to apply through the employer's existing ATS.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Concerning
Screening
The result
HeyMilo leads hackajob by 16 points.
Under rubric v1.0, HeyMilo (Screening) opens a 16-point lead on hackajob (Sourcing), 61 (D) to 45 (F). HeyMilo leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while hackajob leads 1, including Article 11 Technical Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — hackajob 20, HeyMilo 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 71% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- hackajob1
- HeyMilo6
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency20 vs 83
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
hackajob is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only HeyMilo is in scope of
| Record | hackajob | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2023 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight69% of the movement so far
hackajob20HeyMilo8311.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight78% of the movement so far
hackajob32HeyMilo421.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight85% of the movement so far
hackajob55HeyMilo641.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight91% of the movement so far
hackajob38HeyMilo461.0 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight95% of the movement so far
hackajob58HeyMilo620.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight98% of the movement so far
hackajob60HeyMilo660.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 7
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight100% of the movement so far
hackajob60HeyMilo580.4 weighted points to hackajob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -15.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hackajob minus HeyMilo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | hackajob | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 83 | -63 | -11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 42 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 62 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 46 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 45F | 61D | -16 | -15.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hackajob | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hackajob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.