Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
hackajob vs Maki People
hackajob
Archer, hackajob's AI sourcing agent, is calibrated by a recruiter on a hiring brief, then finds, engages and qualifies passive candidates from a 1.5m-member pool and 800m+ indexed profiles and invites those who meet the bar to apply through the employer's existing ATS.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
Concerning
Assessment
The result
Maki People leads hackajob on all 7 criteria.
Maki People finishes 22 points clear of hackajob under rubric v1.0 — 67 (D) against 45 (F) — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Maki People leads every one of the 7 criteria, hackajob none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Article 11 Technical Documentation, hackajob 60 to Maki People 64. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (hackajob 20, Maki People 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 50% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- hackajob0
- Maki People7
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency20 vs 80
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
hackajob is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only Maki People is in scope of
| Record | hackajob | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | FR |
| Founded | 2014 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight50% of the movement so far
hackajob20Maki People8010.8 weighted points to Maki People
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight71% of the movement so far
hackajob32Maki People624.5 weighted points to Maki People
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight81% of the movement so far
hackajob38Maki People552.0 weighted points to Maki People
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight87% of the movement so far
hackajob55Maki People661.3 weighted points to Maki People
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight92% of the movement so far
hackajob60Maki People741.1 weighted points to Maki People
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight96% of the movement so far
hackajob58Maki People640.9 weighted points to Maki People
- 7
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight100% of the movement so far
hackajob60Maki People640.8 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -21.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hackajob minus Maki People, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | hackajob | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 80 | -60 | -10.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 62 | -30 | -4.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 66 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 74 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 45F | 67D | -22 | -21.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hackajob | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 73 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hackajob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.