Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
hackajob vs The Predictive Index
hackajob
Archer, hackajob's AI sourcing agent, is calibrated by a recruiter on a hiring brief, then finds, engages and qualifies passive candidates from a 1.5m-member pool and 800m+ indexed profiles and invites those who meet the bar to apply through the employer's existing ATS.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The Predictive Index
The Predictive Index provides validated behavioral and cognitive psychometric assessments used to screen, hire, and develop employees and design teams, alongside AI-assisted talent-management software.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
3 points separate The Predictive Index and hackajob.
The Predictive Index (Assessment) edges hackajob (Sourcing) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 48 to 45. hackajob and The Predictive Index each lead 3 of the 7 criteria, with 1 level, though the side of the split The Predictive Index holds (headed by Bias Audit Transparency) adds up to more weighted points. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (hackajob 20, The Predictive Index 45) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 81% of the weighted advantage The Predictive Index holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- hackajob3
- The Predictive Index3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency20 vs 45
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
hackajob is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, The Predictive Index under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only The Predictive Index is in scope of
| Record | hackajob | The Predictive Index |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 1955 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight54% of the movement so far
hackajob20The Predictive Index454.5 weighted points to The Predictive Index
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight78% of the movement so far
hackajob60The Predictive Index502.0 weighted points to hackajob
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight85% of the movement so far
hackajob38The Predictive Index430.6 weighted points to The Predictive Index
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight90% of the movement so far
hackajob32The Predictive Index350.4 weighted points to The Predictive Index
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight96% of the movement so far
hackajob58The Predictive Index550.4 weighted points to hackajob
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
hackajob55The Predictive Index520.4 weighted points to hackajob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -2.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hackajob minus The Predictive Index, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | hackajob | The Predictive Index | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 45 | -25 | -4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 35 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 43 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 45F | 48F | -3 | -2.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hackajob | The Predictive Index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; The Predictive Index has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 24 for The Predictive Index, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hackajob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- The Predictive Index last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.