Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
hackajob vs Prevue HR
hackajob
Archer, hackajob's AI sourcing agent, is calibrated by a recruiter on a hiring brief, then finds, engages and qualifies passive candidates from a 1.5m-member pool and 800m+ indexed profiles and invites those who meet the bar to apply through the employer's existing ATS.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Prevue HR
Prevue HR's psychometric platform tests candidates' aptitude, personality and motivations and compares the results with a custom role benchmark to produce a percentage Job Suitability score and Job-Fit report, alongside an optional applicant tracking system (APS Pro).
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates hackajob and Prevue HR.
hackajob (Sourcing) edges Prevue HR (Assessment) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 45 to 44. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of hackajob: hackajob is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Prevue HR on Bias Audit Transparency. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, and Prevue HR holds it (hackajob 20, Prevue HR 44, 18% weight), worth 95% of the weighted advantage Prevue HR builds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- hackajob5
- Prevue HR2
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency20 vs 44
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
hackajob is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Prevue HR under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Prevue HR is in scope of
| Record | hackajob | Prevue HR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | CA |
| Founded | 2014 | 1994 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight43% of the movement so far
hackajob20Prevue HR444.3 weighted points to Prevue HR
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight73% of the movement so far
hackajob60Prevue HR453.0 weighted points to hackajob
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight87% of the movement so far
hackajob58Prevue HR481.5 weighted points to hackajob
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight95% of the movement so far
hackajob32Prevue HR270.8 weighted points to hackajob
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight97% of the movement so far
hackajob38Prevue HR400.2 weighted points to Prevue HR
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight99% of the movement so far
hackajob60Prevue HR580.2 weighted points to hackajob
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
hackajob55Prevue HR540.1 weighted points to hackajob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hackajob minus Prevue HR, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | hackajob | Prevue HR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 45 | +15 | +3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 44 | -24 | -4.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 27 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 48 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 54 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 45F | 44F | +1 | +1.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hackajob | Prevue HR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Prevue HR has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Prevue HR sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 76 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 34 for Prevue HR, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hackajob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Prevue HR last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.