Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
hackajob vs Toggl Hire
hackajob
Archer, hackajob's AI sourcing agent, is calibrated by a recruiter on a hiring brief, then finds, engages and qualifies passive candidates from a 1.5m-member pool and 800m+ indexed profiles and invites those who meet the bar to apply through the employer's existing ATS.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
hackajob leads Toggl Hire on 6 of the 7 criteria.
hackajob scores 45 and Toggl Hire 37 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. hackajob leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Toggl Hire is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 hackajob leads is FRIA Support, hackajob 32 to Toggl Hire 30. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (hackajob 60, Toggl Hire 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 73% of the weighted advantage hackajob holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- hackajob6
- Toggl Hire0
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation60 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
hackajob is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Toggl Hire under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only Toggl Hire is in scope of
| Record | hackajob | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | EE |
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight73% of the movement so far
hackajob60Toggl Hire306.0 weighted points to hackajob
- 2
Customer Documentation
8% weight82% of the movement so far
hackajob60Toggl Hire500.8 weighted points to hackajob
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight88% of the movement so far
hackajob58Toggl Hire550.4 weighted points to hackajob
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight92% of the movement so far
hackajob55Toggl Hire520.4 weighted points to hackajob
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight96% of the movement so far
hackajob38Toggl Hire350.4 weighted points to hackajob
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
hackajob32Toggl Hire300.3 weighted points to hackajob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +8.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +8.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hackajob minus Toggl Hire, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | hackajob | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 30 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 20 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 30 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 35 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 45F | 37F | +8 | +8.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hackajob | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hackajob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.