Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs Indeed
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Indeed
Job marketplace whose employer-side AI (the Talent Scout agent, Sourcing Assistant, Smart Screening and candidate matching) sources, ranks and scores candidates from Indeed's profile pool and applicant flow and drafts outreach to them.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
4 points separate Indeed and HackerEarth.
Indeed (Sourcing) edges HackerEarth (Assessment) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 50 to 46. Indeed leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including FRIA Support, while HackerEarth leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring. Human Oversight Design is the widest raw gap (HackerEarth 56, Indeed 63) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is FRIA Support at 15% (HackerEarth 32, Indeed 38), 21% of the weighted advantage Indeed builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth1
- Indeed6
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design56 vs 63
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth is filed under Assessment AI, Indeed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only HackerEarth is in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | Indeed |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight20% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32Indeed380.9 weighted points to Indeed
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight39% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52Indeed580.9 weighted points to Indeed
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight58% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56Indeed630.8 weighted points to Indeed
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight71% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55Indeed580.6 weighted points to Indeed
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight83% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57Indeed640.6 weighted points to Indeed
- 6
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight95% of the movement so far
HackerEarth35Indeed380.5 weighted points to Indeed
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42Indeed400.2 weighted points to HackerEarth
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -4.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -4.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus Indeed, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | Indeed | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 38 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 63 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 64 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 50F | -4 | -4.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | Indeed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 2 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 36 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Indeed has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Indeed sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 79 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 40 for Indeed, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Indeed last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.