Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs Interviewer.AI
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
1 point separates Interviewer.AI and HackerEarth.
Interviewer.AI (Video interview) edges HackerEarth (Assessment) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 47 to 46. HackerEarth takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 4 for Interviewer.AI, whose share includes Data Governance Disclosure, and 1 is level. Data Governance Disclosure, at 15%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to Interviewer.AI (HackerEarth 52, Interviewer.AI 60), 54% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Post-Market Monitoring, HackerEarth 42 to Interviewer.AI 32.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth2
- Interviewer.AI4
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring42 vs 32
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data Governance Disclosure15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth is filed under Assessment AI, Interviewer.AI under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | Interviewer.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight30% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52Interviewer.AI601.2 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight60% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42Interviewer.AI321.2 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight75% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55Interviewer.AI520.6 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight87% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56Interviewer.AI600.5 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight98% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32Interviewer.AI350.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57Interviewer.AI580.1 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus Interviewer.AI, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | Interviewer.AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 35 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 60 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 32 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 58 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 47F | -1 | -0.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | Interviewer.AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.