Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs PageUp
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
The result
PageUp leads HackerEarth on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, PageUp (ATS-integrated) opens an 18-point lead on HackerEarth (Assessment), 64 (D) to 46 (F). PageUp takes all 7 criteria and HackerEarth none of them; the nearest contest is Customer Documentation, HackerEarth 57 to PageUp 63. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HackerEarth 35, PageUp 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 46% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth0
- PageUp7
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency35 vs 80
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth is filed under Assessment AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only HackerEarth is in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2012 | 1997 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight46% of the movement so far
HackerEarth35PageUp808.1 weighted points to PageUp
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight67% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55PageUp743.8 weighted points to PageUp
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight76% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52PageUp631.6 weighted points to PageUp
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight85% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42PageUp551.6 weighted points to PageUp
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight92% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32PageUp401.2 weighted points to PageUp
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight97% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56PageUp641.0 weighted points to PageUp
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57PageUp630.5 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus PageUp, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 74 | -19 | -3.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 80 | -45 | -8.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 40 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 63 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 64 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 63 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 64D | -18 | -17.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.