Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs Recruit CRM
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM is an ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies and executive search firms, with AI resume parsing, AI sourcing from an 800M+ profile Global Database, and AI candidate matching that scores and ranks candidates 0–100 with explanations for each dimension.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
HackerEarth takes the total, Recruit CRM takes more of the criteria.
HackerEarth scores 46 and Recruit CRM 40 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Recruit CRM leads more of the criteria than HackerEarth — 4 to 2 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which HackerEarth leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to HackerEarth. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (HackerEarth 55, Recruit CRM 34) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 61% of the weighted advantage HackerEarth holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth2
- Recruit CRM4
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation55 vs 34
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth is filed under Assessment AI, Recruit CRM under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only HackerEarth is in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | Recruit CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | Not recorded |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight53% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55Recruit CRM344.2 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight86% of the movement so far
HackerEarth35Recruit CRM202.7 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight90% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32Recruit CRM340.3 weighted points to Recruit CRM
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight94% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52Recruit CRM540.3 weighted points to Recruit CRM
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight97% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56Recruit CRM580.2 weighted points to Recruit CRM
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57Recruit CRM600.2 weighted points to Recruit CRM
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +5.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +5.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus Recruit CRM, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | Recruit CRM | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 34 | +21 | +4.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 20 | +15 | +2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 34 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 54 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 58 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 42 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 60 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 40F | +6 | +5.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | Recruit CRM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 74 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruit CRM last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.