Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs Talogy
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Talogy
Talogy sells psychometric talent-assessment products - cognitive ability tests (Logiks, Mindgage), personality inventories (Caliper, P.A.P.I.), values-based screening, situational judgement and job simulations, and 360 feedback - delivered through its TalogyTech platform for candidate selection and employee development.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
4 points separate HackerEarth and Talogy.
Within the Assessment cohort, HackerEarth edges Talogy by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 46 to 42. Talogy takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Customer Documentation among them, against 5 for HackerEarth, whose share includes Post-Market Monitoring, and 1 is level. Even Post-Market Monitoring, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HackerEarth 42, Talogy 32, 12% weight), is only 30% of the weighted advantage HackerEarth builds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth5
- Talogy1
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring42 vs 32
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Post-Market Monitoring12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth and Talogy are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | Talogy |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 1946 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight29% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42Talogy321.2 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight55% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32Talogy251.1 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight77% of the movement so far
HackerEarth35Talogy300.9 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight88% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56Talogy520.5 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight98% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55Talogy530.4 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57Talogy580.1 weighted points to Talogy
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +3.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +3.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus Talogy, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | Talogy | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 53 | +2 | +0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 25 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 52 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 52 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 32 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 58 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 42F | +4 | +3.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | Talogy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 22 | 9 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Talogy has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for Talogy, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talogy last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.