Talogy
Talogy sells psychometric talent-assessment products - cognitive ability tests (Logiks, Mindgage), personality inventories (Caliper, P.A.P.I.), values-based screening, situational judgement and job simulations, and 360 feedback - delivered through its TalogyTech platform for candidate selection and employee development.
HireAIScore rates Talogy 42 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed August 2, 2026. Talogy ranks 39 of 49 vendors rated in Assessment AI, against a category average of 48. That score is drawn from 28 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for Talogy — 22 with a cited source, 9 recording that nothing was located.
§ 01 - Company facts
- Legal name
- Talogy, Inc.
- Founded
- 1946
- Headquarters
- United States · US
- Pricing tier
- Enterprise
- Market side
- Employer-side (AEDT)
- Categories
- AssessmentScreening
- Website
- talogy.com
These are company details, not findings. They are editable by a verified representative and carry no weight in the score, which is built only from the cited evidence below.
§ 02 - Score breakdown
§ Score breakdown
Category scoring
Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.
- 01
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Weight 20%53
+10.6 · category avg 53
- 02
Bias Audit Transparency
Weight 18%30
+5.4 · category avg 47
- 03
FRIA Support
Weight 15%25
+3.8 · category avg 32
- 04
Data Governance Disclosure
Weight 15%52
+7.8 · category avg 55
- 05
Human Oversight Design
Weight 12%52
+6.2 · category avg 55
- 06
Post-Market Monitoring
Weight 12%32
+3.8 · category avg 39
- 07
Customer Documentation
Weight 8%58
+4.6 · category avg 59
Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 49 Assessment AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.
§ 03 - Strongest · weakest
Strongest category
Customer Documentation
Raw score 58 · contributes 4.6 to total.
58 against a 59 category average
Weakest category
FRIA Support
Raw score 25 · contributes 3.8 to total.
25 against a 32 category average
§ 04 - Cited evidence
Download diligence record→§ Evidence
Cited per category
Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence.
Evidence ledger
- Items
- 28
- Documentation
- 19
- Absence
- 9
- With a source URL
- 22 of 28
- Source hostnames
- 3
- Fewest items
- 2
- FRIA Support
These figures measure how thoroughly Talogy was reviewed, not how Talogy performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.
Article 11 Technical Documentation
4 items53
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
Talogy publishes a seven-principle AI framework covering security and safety, privacy, fairness, reliability and accuracy, transparency and explainability, human agency, and accountability and governance, and states it uses a 'closed AI' approach in which algorithms are guarded from external input and client data is not fed to public generative AI tools.
https://talogy.com/en/knowledge-hub/ai-in-talent-assessment/
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
An ethics article dated October 2023 and last updated February 2026 maps its position onto the OECD trustworthy-AI framework and references the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and SIOP 2023 validation guidelines, while conceding there are 'not yet established best practices' for demonstrating that AI-based assessments follow ethical principles.
https://talogy.com/en/blog/the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-ethical-use-of-ai-in-assessment/
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
The Mindgage product page describes a hybrid of psychological theory and machine learning intended to keep scoring models 'psychologically informed and humanly interpretable', but links no validation study, technical manual or whitepaper and notes that accreditation is required.
https://talogy.com/en/talent-management-solutions/assessments/mindgage-cognitive-ability-test/
- AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026
The complete legal hub lists only Terms and Conditions, Terms of Use, Privacy Notice, Sub-Processors, Accessibility, Anti-Slavery Policy, Cookies Policy and Notices - there is no AI policy, model card, system card, instructions-for-use document or ISO 42001 certificate anywhere on the site, resources hub or product pages.
Bias Audit Transparency
4 items30
- AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026
No NYC Local Law 144 bias audit, summary of results, or independent audit by any recognised auditor (BABL AI, DCI, ORCAA, Warden AI, Holistic AI, Credo AI, ConductorAI) could be found; searches covered the Talogy legal hub, notices page, resources hub, knowledge hub, TalogyTech product pages and the Mindgage page, plus targeted web searches pairing Talogy and PSI Talent Management with LL 144, AEDT, adverse impact and each named audit firm.
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
Talogy states its Mindgage ability series uses machine learning to optimise scoring and reports up to a 60% reduction in subgroup differences versus traditional assessments at equivalent predictive validity, but names no auditor, discloses no sample and publishes no underlying data.
https://talogy.com/en/knowledge-hub/ai-in-talent-assessment/
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
A fairness article dated September 2022 and last updated September 2025 describes reductions in mean differences for minority and female candidates as 'preliminary evidence' from a pilot study, giving no effect sizes, impact ratios or formal adverse-impact methodology.
https://talogy.com/en/blog/ensuring-fairness-in-assessment-through-cognitive-ability-testing/
- AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026
The reporting product page describes hiring-manager, candidate, deep-dive and group-dashboard reports but documents no adverse-impact report, bias dashboard or diversity-metric output that a customer could use to evidence its own audit.
FRIA Support
2 items25
- AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026
The notices page lists only a Brexit notice, the EU-U.S./UK/Swiss Data Privacy Framework policy and a Research Data Privacy Statement - there is no EU AI Act notice, Article 27 Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment template, DPIA template or deployer-obligation guidance.
- AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026
Searches for Talogy guidance on EU AI Act high-risk obligations, Colorado SB 24-205 deployer duties and the Illinois AI Video Interview Act returned no Talogy-authored material; no trust centre, compliance portal or customer compliance pack is published, and the customer support hub at support.talogy.com returns HTTP 403 to unauthenticated visitors.
Data Governance Disclosure
5 items52
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
The privacy policy PDF enumerates data categories including sensitive information (age, race, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, criminal convictions), biometric and medical information, remote-proctoring webcam and desktop capture, and assessment responses, and sets out retention, breach procedures, GDPR/CCPA legal bases and standard contractual clauses.
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
A named sub-processor list discloses vendors and processing locations including AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, OVH Cloud, Proofpoint, Zendesk, SendGrid and Mimecast, plus optional assessment partners Cammio, Pipplet, Arctic Shores, Hogan, Hogrefe and Kaplan, with US and EU data-centre locations.
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
A separate December 2024 Research Data Privacy Statement discloses that parent company Lifelong Learner Holdings acts as controller for research assessments, collects gender, age group and optional ethnicity for internal research and development to improve existing and build new products, and stores that data in the UK and EU.
https://talogy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Research-Data-Privacy-Statement-12-06-2024.pdf
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
Talogy, Inc. and its US subsidiaries are certified to the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, the UK Extension and the Swiss-U.S. DPF, with FTC jurisdiction and binding arbitration as final recourse; the policy makes no statement about automated decision-making.
https://talogy.com/en/legal/notices/eu-us-uk-extension-swiss-us-data-privacy-framework-policy/
- AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026
The privacy policy cites ISO/IEC 27001:2013 alongside NIST, PCI and CIS only as sources of guidance used to design its security programme, not as a certification held; no ISO 27001 or ISO 42001 certificate, SOC 2 report, model training-data description or training-data exclusion list is published anywhere on the site.
Human Oversight Design
4 items52
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
Talogy states that human intervention is still needed when working with AI assessment tools and that HR professionals must apply judgement computers do not have, and lists human agency and transparency/explainability among its seven AI principles.
https://talogy.com/en/knowledge-hub/ai-in-talent-assessment/
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
The TalogyTech platform page frames AI as an assistant rather than a replacement for talent expertise and states that Talogy avoids using AI for assessment interpretation, a concrete scope limit on where automation is permitted in the decision chain.
https://talogy.com/en/talent-management-solutions/talogy-tech/
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
Reporting is structured for human review, with score-bearing hiring-manager reports, descriptive candidate reports, deep-dive psychological reports and group dashboards, though no override, appeal or reviewer audit-trail control is described.
- AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026
No documentation was found for override or human-review enforcement controls, per-jurisdiction configuration toggles, decision audit logs, or an in-interface explanation of why a candidate received a given score, across the product pages, knowledge hub, resources hub and legal hub.
Post-Market Monitoring
4 items32
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
The privacy policy states Talogy has procedures to deal with suspected personal-data breaches and will notify affected individuals and applicable regulators where legally required, and routes data-subject and complaint contact through a named Data Protection Officer and Privacy Portal.
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
An accessibility statement provides accessibility@talogy.com as a reporting channel for users encountering problems and describes recurring testing with screen readers and magnifiers involving users with disabilities, published in 21 languages.
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
Talogy describes a 'monitor' step involving ongoing review of data for unusual patterns, but this is framed as cheating and assessment-integrity detection rather than post-deployment monitoring of model performance or adverse impact.
https://talogy.com/en/knowledge-hub/ai-in-talent-assessment/
- AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026
No public status page, security.txt, vulnerability disclosure policy, security contact address, incident history, model or scoring changelog, or continuous fairness-monitoring dashboard could be found on talogy.com, its legal hub or its notices pages.
Customer Documentation
5 items58
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
A knowledge hub carries twenty topic hubs including dedicated sections on AI in talent assessment and on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, spanning blogs, customer stories, podcasts, webinars and research.
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
Detailed public product documentation covers assessment types, modularity, WCAG 2.1 accessibility rating, reporting formats and named ATS integrations with Taleo, Oracle, Workday, Kenexa, iCIMS and SAP SuccessFactors.
https://talogy.com/en/talent-management-solutions/talogy-tech/
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
A consolidated legal hub publishes Terms and Conditions, Terms of Use, Privacy Notice, Sub-Processors, Accessibility, Anti-Slavery Policy, Cookies Policy and Notices, giving buyers a usable contractual and privacy baseline.
- DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026
An 'Artificial Intelligence in talent management' whitepaper covering the pros and cons of AI in the field is available only after completing a lead-capture form, so its content cannot be independently verified or cited by customers.
https://info.talogy.com/en-us/artificial-intelligence-talent-management
- AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026
No NYC Local Law 144 guidance, EU AI Act deployer guidance, candidate AEDT notice template, publicly downloadable Data Processing Agreement, or compliance FAQ was found; the customer support hub at support.talogy.com returns HTTP 403 to unauthenticated visitors, so its documentation is not publicly assessable.
§ 05 - Editorial notes
Company overview
Talogy is the assessment brand created in 2022 when PSI Talent Management consolidated seventeen acquired firms - including Cubiks, Caliper, Select International, a&dc and IPAT - under a single identity; its own About page traces the lineage to 1946 and psychologist Floyd E. Ruch. The company is headquartered at 611 N. Brand Blvd in Glendale, California, operates in 25+ countries with 750+ staff, and sits under parent holding company Lifelong Learner Holdings LLC, which is named as data controller in Talogy's Research Data Privacy Statement. Its TalogyTech platform delivers cognitive, personality, values and leadership assessments with configurable reporting and integrations into Taleo, Oracle, Workday, Kenexa, iCIMS and SAP SuccessFactors. Pricing is not published and product use generally requires accreditation, indicating an enterprise, consultative sales motion.
Regulatory exposure
Talogy is squarely exposed as an AI-system provider under EU AI Act Annex III(4): its tools evaluate candidates for recruitment and selection, and it markets machine-learning-derived scoring in the Mindgage battery. It is also plainly in scope for NYC Local Law 144 wherever its scored assessments substantially assist hiring decisions in New York City, and for Illinois and Colorado obligations. The gap between that exposure and its public record is wide. Talogy publishes a seven-point AI ethics framework and cites the OECD principles, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and SIOP 2023 validation guidelines, but it publishes no bias audit by any independent auditor, no summary of results, no model or system card, no instructions for use, no ISO 42001 or SOC 2 attestation, and no FRIA or deployer guidance of any kind. Its fairness claims - up to a 60% reduction in subgroup differences for Mindgage - are self-reported and described in its own blog as 'preliminary evidence' from a pilot study, with no statistics, effect sizes or methodology disclosed. Its own ethics article concedes there are 'not yet established best practices' for demonstrating ethical compliance, which is a fair description of its own disclosure posture. Its data-protection documentation is genuinely above average - a detailed privacy policy, a named sub-processor list with locations, an EU-U.S./UK/Swiss Data Privacy Framework certification and a separate research data statement disclosing R&D reuse of assessment data including optional ethnicity - but that is privacy compliance, not AI-governance compliance.
Path to a higher score
The single highest-value move is to commission and publish a downloadable independent bias audit of the scored assessments most used in US hiring, naming the auditor, the date, the sample and intersectional impact ratios, and to repeat it annually. Second, convert the internal validation work that already exists behind accreditation into public technical documentation: a per-instrument technical manual or model card covering intended purpose, construct, training and norming data, known limitations, and an explainability statement that substantiates the 'humanly interpretable' claim made for Mindgage's hybrid scoring. Third, publish the underlying statistics behind the 60% subgroup-difference claim rather than leaving it as an unsourced marketing figure. Fourth, add an AI-specific section to the legal hub carrying deployer guidance for EU AI Act Article 26/27, NYC LL 144 notice templates, and Illinois and Colorado obligations, alongside a public DPA. Finally, stand up basic post-market surface - a security contact and vulnerability disclosure route, a model and scoring changelog, and a stated cadence for re-checking adverse impact in live client data. ISO 42001 certification would consolidate several of these at once.
§ Regulatory frame
What applies to assessment ai.
Assessment is the most-regulated surface in AI hiring. NYC LL 144, EEOC and OFCCP frameworks, Illinois HB 3773, and EU AI Act Annex III §4 all apply, with overlap on bias-audit obligations.
§ Compare
Build any comparison→Talogy against its nearest-scoring peers.
In Assessment AI.
§ Others rated in Assessment AI
All assessment vendors→Ranked 39 of 49 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.
- 36Wonderlic43F
- 37CodeSignal43F
- 38Talview42F
- 39TalogyThis profile42F
- 40Mercer | Mettl42F
- 41Zoho Recruit42F
Conflicts of interest
No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.
Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.