The result

Talogy and Talview tie at 42.

Talogy, filed under Assessment, and Talview, filed under Video interview, tie at 42 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Talogy leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Talview 2, with 2 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Talogy 30, Talview 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 80% of the weighted advantage Talview holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Talogy3
  • Talview2
  • Level2
Widest raw gap
Bias Audit Transparency30 vs 38
Heaviest weighted swing
Bias Audit Transparency18% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Talogy is filed under Assessment AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

RecordTalogyTalview
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19462012

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight41% of the movement so far

    Talogy30
    Talview38

    1.4 weighted points to Talview

  2. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight59% of the movement so far

    Talogy53
    Talview50

    0.6 weighted points to Talogy

  3. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight76% of the movement so far

    Talogy52
    Talview48

    0.6 weighted points to Talogy

  4. Customer Documentation

    8% weight90% of the movement so far

    Talogy58
    Talview52

    0.5 weighted points to Talogy

  5. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight100% of the movement so far

    Talogy52
    Talview55

    0.4 weighted points to Talview

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.1.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Talogy minus Talview, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightTalogyTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5350+3+0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3038-8-1.4
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5248+4+0.6
Human Oversight Design12%5255-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3232--
Customer Documentation8%5852+6+0.5
Total100%42F42F--0.1

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightTalogyTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%32Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
FRIA Support15%12—01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%229Sources on the vendor's own domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

Talogy has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for Talogy, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Talogy last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next