Talview
AI-powered hiring and exam-integrity platform spanning video interviewing, skills assessments, identity verification, and AI proctoring.
§ 01 — Score breakdown
§ Score breakdown
Category scoring
Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.
- 01
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Weight 20%50
+10.0
- 02
Bias Audit Transparency
Weight 18%38
+6.8
- 03
FRIA Support
Weight 15%25
+3.8
- 04
Data Governance Disclosure
Weight 15%48
+7.2
- 05
Human Oversight Design
Weight 12%55
+6.6
- 06
Post-Market Monitoring
Weight 12%32
+3.8
- 07
Customer Documentation
Weight 8%52
+4.2
§ 02 — Strongest · weakest
Strongest category
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Raw score 50 · contributes 10.0 to total.
Weakest category
FRIA Support
Raw score 25 · contributes 3.8 to total.
§ 03 — Cited evidence
§ Evidence
Cited per category
Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence.
§ 04 — Editorial notes
Company overview
Talview Inc. is a US-headquartered (San Mateo, CA) AI hiring and proctoring vendor founded in 2012 as Interview Master and restructured under its current name in 2017, with major operations in Bangalore. Its platform spans video interviewing, assessments, identity verification, and remote/AI proctoring, marketed around two agentic products — "Alvy," an AI proctor for exam integrity, and "Ivy," an AI interviewer — alongside a "Seven-Layer Security Framework."
Regulatory exposure
Talview sits squarely in the high-risk zone of both the EU AI Act (Annex III employment use) and US AEDT regimes: it scores, screens, and ranks candidates and runs biometric identity and behaviour analysis during exams. That biometric proctoring layer adds Illinois BIPA and EU biometric-data exposure on top of NYC LL 144, Colorado, and Illinois AI-hiring rules. Despite this, Talview publishes no NYC LL 144 bias-audit summary, no EU AI Act deployer guidance or FRIA materials, and no ISO 42001 / model-card documentation — its public AI-governance posture rests almost entirely on a single "Ethical AI Practices" page and a Trust Center that lists security certifications without downloadable evidence.
Path to a higher score
The fastest credibility gains would be (a) commissioning and publicly posting an independent, downloadable NYC LL 144 bias audit from a recognised auditor, renewed annually; (b) replacing the unnamed "third-party audits" claims with named, dated, downloadable reports and a self-serve Trust Center that gates the actual SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certificates; and (c) shipping deployer-facing artifacts — a linked DPA and subprocessor list, an EU AI Act instructions-for-use page, explicit training-data and exclusion statements, and a public status/incident channel.
Conflicts of interest
No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework — the consulting firm that operates this directory — provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.
Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.