Talview

AI-powered hiring and exam-integrity platform spanning video interviewing, skills assessments, identity verification, and AI proctoring.

HireAIScore rates Talview 42 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed June 7, 2026. Talview ranks 31 of 57 vendors rated in Video interview AI, against a category average of 44. That score is drawn from 17 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for Talview — 11 with a cited source, 6 recording that nothing was located.

Score breakdown

Talview, criterion by criterion

Each rubric criterion is scored out of 100 on the cited evidence, then weighted into the total.

Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Weight 20% · avg 46

    50

    +10.0

  2. Bias Audit Transparency

    Weight 18% · avg 38

    38

    +6.8

  3. FRIA Support

    Weight 15% · avg 30

    25

    +3.8

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    Weight 15% · avg 51

    48

    +7.2

  5. Human Oversight Design

    Weight 12% · avg 56

    55

    +6.6

  6. Post-Market Monitoring

    Weight 12% · avg 37

    32

    +3.8

  7. Customer Documentation

    Weight 8% · avg 56

    52

    +4.2

Total weighted score

42.4(rounded to 42 for display)

Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 57 Video interview AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.

Strongest criterion

Human Oversight Design

55raw / 100

Contributes 6.6 to the total. 55 against a 56 category average.

Weakest criterion

FRIA Support

25raw / 100

Contributes 3.8 to the total. 25 against a 30 category average.

Cited evidence

The evidence behind the score

Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence. Open a criterion to see what was found, when, and where.

Download diligence record

Evidence ledger

Items
17
Documentation
8
Public statement
3
Absence
6
With a source URL
11 of 17
Source hostnames
1
Fewest items
1
FRIA Support

These figures measure how thoroughly Talview was reviewed, not how Talview performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.

Article 11 Technical Documentation

2 items
50
  • DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Ethical AI Practices page setting out fairness, explainability, human-oversight, and 'locked model' principles, with no model cards or technical pack.

    https://www.talview.com/en/ethical-ai-practices

  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No public material located as of 2026-06-07.

    Where we looked: No ISO 42001, model cards, system cards, or instructions-for-use located on talview.com (Trust Center, Ethical AI, Seven-Layer Security pages).

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Bias Audit Transparency

2 items
38
  • Public statementCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Claims 'third-party audits to ensure impartiality' and continuous fairness-metric monitoring, but names no auditor and links no report.

    https://www.talview.com/en/ethical-ai-practices

  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No public material located as of 2026-06-07.

    Where we looked: No downloadable NYC LL 144 bias audit located (talview.com, ACLU LL144 tracker, auditor-specific searches).

    Have a URL that disputes this?

FRIA Support

1 item
25
  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No public material located as of 2026-06-07.

    Where we looked: talview.com Trust Center, Ethical AI, and Privacy Policy contain no EU AI Act / Article 26-27 references, No FRIA template located.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Data Governance Disclosure

4 items
48
  • DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Trust Center listing GDPR, PDPA, CCPA, LGPD, EEOC, and ISO 27001 compliance, with no downloadable certificates.

    https://www.talview.com/trust-center

  • DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    States biometric/behavioral data is kept only for a limited duration then auto-deleted, with US/EU/Australia hosting and pre-presentation anonymization.

    https://www.talview.com/en/privacy-and-security

  • DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Privacy Policy enumerating collected data (biometrics, government ID, A/V recordings, screen captures) and Microsoft face APIs.

    https://www.talview.com/privacy

  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No public material located as of 2026-06-07.

    Where we looked: No published subprocessor list, linked DPA, data-exclusion list, or downloadable SOC 2 / ISO 27001 report located.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Human Oversight Design

2 items
55

Post-Market Monitoring

2 items
32
  • DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Privacy contact (privacy@talview.com) provided, but no dedicated security-disclosure or incident-reporting channel.

    https://www.talview.com/privacy

  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No public material located as of 2026-06-07.

    Where we looked: No public status/uptime page (status.talview.com does not resolve), No model-update changelog or vulnerability-disclosure channel located.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Customer Documentation

4 items
52

Editorial notes

Company overview

Talview Inc. is a US-headquartered (San Mateo, CA) AI hiring and proctoring vendor founded in 2012 as Interview Master and restructured under its current name in 2017, with major operations in Bangalore. Its platform spans video interviewing, assessments, identity verification, and remote/AI proctoring, marketed around two agentic products -"Alvy," an AI proctor for exam integrity, and "Ivy," an AI interviewer - alongside a "Seven-Layer Security Framework."

Regulatory exposure

Talview sits squarely in the high-risk zone of both the EU AI Act (Annex III employment use) and US AEDT regimes: it scores, screens, and ranks candidates and runs biometric identity and behaviour analysis during exams. That biometric proctoring layer adds Illinois BIPA and EU biometric-data exposure on top of NYC LL 144, Colorado, and Illinois AI-hiring rules. Despite this, Talview publishes no NYC LL 144 bias-audit summary, no EU AI Act deployer guidance or FRIA materials, and no ISO 42001 / model-card documentation - its public AI-governance posture rests almost entirely on a single "Ethical AI Practices" page and a Trust Center that lists security certifications without downloadable evidence.

Path to a higher score

The fastest credibility gains would be (a) commissioning and publicly posting an independent, downloadable NYC LL 144 bias audit from a recognised auditor, renewed annually; (b) replacing the unnamed "third-party audits" claims with named, dated, downloadable reports and a self-serve Trust Center that gates the actual SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certificates; and (c) shipping deployer-facing artifacts - a linked DPA and subprocessor list, an EU AI Act instructions-for-use page, explicit training-data and exclusion statements, and a public status/incident channel.

Regulatory frame

What applies to video interview AI.

The most heavily-regulated category. NYC LL 144 has applied since 2023; EU AI Act Annex III §4 treats the assessment layer as high-risk; Mobley v. Workday is shaping vendor-liability case-law here.

Ranking

Others rated in Video interview AI

Ranked 31 of 57 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.

  1. #28Ribbon43F
  2. #29CodeSignal43F
  3. #30Paylocity43F
  4. #31TalviewThis profile42F
  5. #32Humanly42F
  6. #33Tengai42F
All video interview vendors

Conflicts of interest

No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.

Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.