HomeCompareHumanly vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Humanly vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Humanly and Talview tie at 42.

Humanly (Screening) and Talview (Video interview) tie at 42 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Humanly leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Talview 3, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Humanly 35, Talview 25 — and at a 15% weight it carries 68% of the weighted advantage Humanly holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Humanly is filed under Screening AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHumanlyTalview
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20182012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Humanly 35 · Talview 25

    1.5 weighted points to Humanly

  2. 15% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Humanly 40 · Talview 48

    1.2 weighted points to Talview

  3. 20% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Humanly 45 · Talview 50

    1.0 weighted points to Talview

  4. 18% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Humanly 40 · Talview 38

    0.4 weighted points to Humanly

  5. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Humanly 58 · Talview 55

    0.4 weighted points to Humanly

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Humanly 30 · Talview 32

    0.2 weighted points to Talview

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Humanly minus Talview.

CategoryWeightHumanlyTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4550-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4038+2+0.4
FRIA Support15%3525+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4048-8-1.2
Human Oversight Design12%5855+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3032-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%5252--
Total100%42 (F)42 (F)--0.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHumanlyTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%1101
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%126Sources on the vendor's own domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Humanly last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.