§ The result
HeyMilo leads HackerRank by 6 points.
HeyMilo scores 61 (D) and HackerRank 55 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. HeyMilo leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while HackerRank leads 1, including Article 11 Technical Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HackerRank 68, HeyMilo 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HackerRank
HackerRank is a technical skills assessment platform for developer hiring that uses coding tests, interviews, and AI-based features (question generation, ML plagiarism/AI-code detection, and image-analysis proctoring) to evaluate candidates.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
HackerRank is filed under Assessment AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HackerRank | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2009 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HackerRank 68 · HeyMilo 83
2.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 61% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HackerRank 35 · HeyMilo 42
1.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HackerRank 55 · HeyMilo 62
1.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HackerRank 60 · HeyMilo 64
0.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HackerRank 60 · HeyMilo 58
0.4 weighted points to HackerRank
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HackerRank 62 · HeyMilo 66
0.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HackerRank 45 · HeyMilo 46
0.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerRank minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | HackerRank | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 68 | 83 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 42 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 62 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 46 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 66 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 55 (F) | 61 (D) | -6 | -5.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerRank | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HackerRank has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HackerRank and HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for HackerRank, across 3 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerRank last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next