Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs HiredScore
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
HiredScore
AI-driven talent orchestration layer that ranks and routes candidates within an existing ATS. Acquired by Workday in 2024.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
HiredScore leads Harri by 11 points.
HiredScore, filed under Sourcing, comes out 11 points above Harri, filed under ATS-integrated: 52 against 41 under rubric v1.0. The 7 criteria split 4 to 2 in favour of HiredScore, with 1 level: HiredScore is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Harri on FRIA Support. HiredScore takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Harri 35, HiredScore 65), which is 45% of the weighted advantage HiredScore holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, Harri 22 to HiredScore 55.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri2
- HiredScore4
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency22 vs 55
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HiredScore under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Harri is in scope of
| Record | Harri | HiredScore |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight37% of the movement so far
Harri35HiredScore656.0 weighted points to HiredScore
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight74% of the movement so far
Harri22HiredScore555.9 weighted points to HiredScore
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight87% of the movement so far
Harri44HiredScore302.1 weighted points to Harri
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight93% of the movement so far
Harri52HiredScore601.0 weighted points to HiredScore
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight97% of the movement so far
Harri40HiredScore350.6 weighted points to Harri
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri52HiredScore550.4 weighted points to HiredScore
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -10.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -10.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus HiredScore, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | HiredScore | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 65 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 55 | -33 | -5.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 30 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 52F | -11 | -10.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | HiredScore | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 2 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiredScore sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiredScore last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.