HomeCompareHarri vs HiredScore

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Harri vs HiredScore

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

HiredScore leads Harri by 11 points.

HiredScore sits 11 points above Harri under rubric v1.0 — 52 against 41 — with HiredScore filed under Sourcing and Harri under ATS-integrated. HiredScore leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Harri leads 2, including FRIA Support, and 1 is level. HiredScore takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Harri 35, HiredScore 65), which is 45% of the weighted advantage HiredScore holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, Harri 22 to HiredScore 55.

§ The record

Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HiredScore under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Harri is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordHarriHiredScore
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20122012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 37% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Harri 35 · HiredScore 65

    6.0 weighted points to HiredScore

  2. 18% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Harri 22 · HiredScore 55

    5.9 weighted points to HiredScore

  3. 15% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Harri 44 · HiredScore 30

    2.1 weighted points to Harri

  4. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Harri 52 · HiredScore 60

    1.0 weighted points to HiredScore

  5. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Harri 40 · HiredScore 35

    0.6 weighted points to Harri

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Harri 52 · HiredScore 55

    0.4 weighted points to HiredScore

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -10.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -10.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Harri minus HiredScore.

CategoryWeightHarriHiredScoreΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3565-30-6.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2255-33-5.9
FRIA Support15%4430+14+2.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%5255-3-0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5260-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4035+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%6060--
Total100%41 (F)52 (F)-11-10.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHarriHiredScore
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%22Sources on the vendor's own domain10Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on a separate domain
All criteria100%198Sources on the vendor's own domain72Audit reportSources on a separate domain

Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiredScore sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Harri last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HiredScore last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.