Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs Knockri
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Knockri
Knockri runs asynchronous structured behavioural interviews that candidates answer by audio, video or text; it transcribes the answers, uses NLP models to score the work-related behaviours they describe against a skills framework, and produces per-skill scores and ranked shortlists.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
Knockri leads Harri by 6 points.
Knockri scores 47 and Harri 41 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Video interview and ATS-integrated cohorts. Knockri leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Harri leads 3, including FRIA Support. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Harri 35, Knockri 55) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 52% of the weighted advantage Knockri holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri3
- Knockri4
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation35 vs 55
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Knockri under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Knockri is in scope of
| Record | Harri | Knockri |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | CA |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight40% of the movement so far
Harri35Knockri554.0 weighted points to Knockri
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight63% of the movement so far
Harri22Knockri352.3 weighted points to Knockri
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight76% of the movement so far
Harri44Knockri351.3 weighted points to Harri
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight86% of the movement so far
Harri52Knockri601.0 weighted points to Knockri
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight92% of the movement so far
Harri40Knockri350.6 weighted points to Harri
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight96% of the movement so far
Harri52Knockri550.4 weighted points to Knockri
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri60Knockri550.4 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus Knockri, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | Knockri | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 55 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 35 | +9 | +1.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 47F | -6 | -5.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | Knockri | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 36 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Knockri has 41 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Knockri sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 41 for Knockri, across 7 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Knockri last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.