Knockri

Knockri runs asynchronous structured behavioural interviews that candidates answer by audio, video or text; it transcribes the answers, uses NLP models to score the work-related behaviours they describe against a skills framework, and produces per-skill scores and ranked shortlists.

HireAIScore rates Knockri 47 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed September 25, 2026. Knockri ranks 21 of 57 vendors rated in Video interview AI, against a category average of 44. That score is drawn from 41 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for Knockri — 36 with a cited source, 5 recording that nothing was located.

Score breakdown

Knockri, criterion by criterion

Each rubric criterion is scored out of 100 on the cited evidence, then weighted into the total.

Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Weight 20% · avg 46

    55

    +11.0

  2. Bias Audit Transparency

    Weight 18% · avg 38

    35

    +6.3

  3. FRIA Support

    Weight 15% · avg 30

    35

    +5.3

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    Weight 15% · avg 51

    55

    +8.3

  5. Human Oversight Design

    Weight 12% · avg 56

    60

    +7.2

  6. Post-Market Monitoring

    Weight 12% · avg 37

    35

    +4.2

  7. Customer Documentation

    Weight 8% · avg 56

    55

    +4.4

Total weighted score

46.6(rounded to 47 for display)

Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 57 Video interview AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.

Strongest criterion

Human Oversight Design

60raw / 100

Contributes 7.2 to the total. 60 against a 56 category average.

Weakest criterion

Post-Market Monitoring

35raw / 100

Contributes 4.2 to the total. 35 against a 37 category average.

Cited evidence

The evidence behind the score

Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence. Open a criterion to see what was found, when, and where.

Download diligence record

Evidence ledger

Items
41
Documentation
27
Public statement
7
Product feature
2
Absence
5
With a source URL
36 of 41
Source hostnames
8
Fewest items
4
FRIA Support

These figures measure how thoroughly Knockri was reviewed, not how Knockri performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.

Article 11 Technical Documentation

7 items
55
  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Knockri's Ethical AI page is a single-paragraph statement of principles (transparency, careful data selection, bias reduction, verification and validation) with no model documentation, governance structure or policy detail.

    https://knockri.com/ethical-ai/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The science page works as an explainability statement: it says the models analyse only the interview transcript with NLP, detect no non-verbal or emotional cues, and avoid the practice of training on human evaluators' interview ratings.

    https://knockri.com/science-and-dei/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Knockri's PCT application 'System and method for behavioral attribute measurement' (published 8 December 2022) discloses the method: responses are converted to text, transformer language models such as BERT or RoBERTa are fine-tuned on human-annotated behaviour data, and standardised scores are converted to percentiles to rank applicants.

    https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2022251970A1/en

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The Treasury Board Secretariat's Algorithmic Impact Assessment of its Knockri pilot (published February 2024) explains the scoring in plain language: audio is transcribed, an NLP model flags work behaviours, each question's score is the share of rubric behaviours present and the overall score is their average; it also says the production models are static, the algorithm is a trade secret and Knockri's technical documentation went to TBS rather than being published.

    https://open.canada.ca/data/en/info/52b8574d-5c95-463b-b375-8edd092cea30

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The reports page offers the white papers 'The Science of Knockri's AI-Based Selection Procedures' and 'The Knockri Approach to Legal Defensibility', but each 'Get The Report' button leads to a lead-capture form rather than a public download.

    https://knockri.com/reports/

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    IBM's May 2026 case study says Knockri uses traditional machine learning for scoring and classification, uses LLMs for summarization, interpretation, orchestration and candidate support, and governs both through watsonx.governance.

    https://www.ibm.com/new/product-blog/how-knockri-scaled-structured-hiring-with-ibm-watsonx

  • AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    No model or system card, instructions-for-use document, ISO/IEC 42001 certification or downloadable technical documentation pack was found on the knockri.com sitemap pages (ethical-ai, science-and-dei, security, reports, privacy and product pages) or in web searches. Knockri also runs a Drata trust center at trust.knockri.com that is not linked from its site; it sits behind a Cloudflare bot challenge, so its contents could not be reviewed for this assessment.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Bias Audit Transparency

5 items
35
  • AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    No NYC Local Law 144 bias-audit summary or independent audit (BABL AI, DCI, ORCAA, Warden AI, Holistic AI, Credo AI) was found on any knockri.com sitemap page (including the security, science, reports and FAQ pages), in web searches pairing Knockri with 'bias audit', 'Local Law 144' and 'AEDT', or at trust.warden-ai.com/knockri (404). Knockri also runs a Drata trust center at trust.knockri.com that is not linked from its site; it sits behind a Cloudflare bot challenge, so its contents could not be reviewed for this assessment.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The TBS Algorithmic Impact Assessment says Knockri gave TBS documentation showing that its behavioural predictions perform equally across demographic groups and that its transcription error rates beat industry guidelines, but answers 'No' when asked whether the bias-testing information is publicly available.

    https://open.canada.ca/data/en/info/52b8574d-5c95-463b-b375-8edd092cea30

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Knockri's report on adverse impact and its content and criterion-related validation studies sits behind a lead form, and the page shows no figures.

    https://knockri.com/the-knocki-approach-to-legal-defensibility/

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Knockri describes an 842-participant study, run with Virginia Tech's Louis Hickman and presented at SIOP, that relates its automated scores to rated personality, cognitive ability, GPA and hireability; the write-up reports no subgroup or adverse-impact results.

    https://knockri.com/blog/recruiting-tools/siop-annual-conference/

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The Globe and Mail reported on 3 January 2020 that Knockri's software also analysed facial expressions and had been trained on applicant videos scored by client recruiters, which differs from Knockri's current transcript-only description; no independent audit has verified the current design.

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-canadian-employers-turn-to-ai-to-analyze-video-interviews-of-job/

FRIA Support

4 items
35

Data Governance Disclosure

7 items
55
  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Says scoring analyses only the interview transcript and detects no non-verbal or emotional cues, and that race, gender, age, ethnicity, accent, appearance and sexual preference do not contribute to a score.

    https://knockri.com/science-and-dei/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Knockri's patent describes its training data as interview transcripts labelled for work behaviours by at least two human annotators, with disagreements settled by subject-matter experts, using a behaviour taxonomy adapted from the O*NET work-activity framework.

    https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2022251970A1/en

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The candidate FAQ lists the data stored (name, email, phone number, and video, audio or text responses) and says it is kept until the employer instructs a purge or the candidate asks for deletion, with no default retention period.

    https://knockri.com/candidate-faq/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The security page claims ISO 27001:2013 certification (an edition since replaced by ISO/IEC 27001:2022), describes GDPR measures, and lists data Knockri does not collect, such as health, financial, date-of-birth and government-ID data.

    https://knockri.com/security/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The privacy notice (updated 26 February 2025) says services are hosted in the USA, Canada and the EU and relies on Standard Contractual Clauses, but it still cites the invalidated Privacy Shield framework, ties candidate-data retention to customer agreements and does not say whether candidate responses are used to train models.

    https://knockri.com/privacy/

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Knockri announced a SOC 2 Type II examination in February 2023 without naming the audit firm.

    https://knockri.com/blog/press/knockri-achieves-soc-2-type-2-certification/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The homepage FAQ says every candidate gets a proctoring 'Trust Score' that estimates the likelihood of cheating using active proctoring and 'AI-driven classifiers', but it does not say which signals feed the score.

    https://knockri.com/

Human Oversight Design

5 items
60
  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Scores are broken down by skill and behaviour so recruiters can see 'the rationale behind the score', and shortlists can be filtered by overall score or by individual skill.

    https://knockri.com/shortlisting-transparent-scoring/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The candidate FAQ says employers can set responses to be scored by AI or reviewed by their talent team, and that 'final decisions are always made by people, not AI'.

    https://knockri.com/candidate-faq/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    TBS's AIA reports that the system allows human overrides and logs them, keeps an audit trail naming the model version behind each result, can give reasons, and gives HR a Behaviour Insight report of behaviours shown and missed plus the audio of every response.

    https://open.canada.ca/data/en/info/52b8574d-5c95-463b-b375-8edd092cea30

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    A 'bias filter' lets recruiters view candidate results by ID rather than by name.

    https://knockri.com/fair-hiring/

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The behavioural-assessments page says recruiters can 'automatically send invites to schedule interviews based on the rank order of top scoring candidates', an option that lets the score alone trigger the next-stage invitation.

    https://knockri.com/behavioural-assessments/

Post-Market Monitoring

5 items
35

Customer Documentation

8 items
55
  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    A detailed candidate FAQ, also available in French, covers what is assessed, AI versus human review, the data stored, retention, accommodations and 24/7 support.

    https://knockri.com/candidate-faq/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The product overview describes building assessments from video, audio or written questions, giving accommodations and extensions, and scoring candidates against a customised skills framework with questions vetted by an I/O psychologist.

    https://knockri.com/product-overview/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Pricing is public: Growth costs $799 a month and Business $2,499 a month, both billed annually and covering 2,500 and 10,000 AI-evaluated interviews a year, while Enterprise is priced on request.

    https://knockri.com/pricing/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    A public Jira Service Management help centre hosts Candidate Care resources and a Recruiter Support portal.

    https://knockri.atlassian.net/servicedesk/customer/portals

  • Product featureCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The integrations page shows connectors for Workday, SAP, Oracle, iCIMS, Greenhouse, ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR and Avature, including bulk invites and data import and export.

    https://knockri.com/integrations/

  • Product featureCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Since May 2022 Knockri's behavioural video assessment has been listed on the SAP Store with integration into SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

    https://knockri.com/blog/press-releases/knockri-now-available-on-sap-store/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The Fair Hiring page links to the form-gated reports and still shows a placeholder case-study teaser reading 'increase racial & gender diversity by XX%'.

    https://knockri.com/fair-hiring/

  • AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    No public DPA, subprocessor list, guidance for deployers on NYC Local Law 144 or the Illinois AI Video Interview Act, candidate-notice templates or EU AI Act deployer documentation was found on any knockri.com sitemap page.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Editorial notes

Company overview

Knockri Inc. is a Toronto company founded in 2017 by Jahanzaib Ansari (CEO) and Faisal Ahmed (CTO). It sells AI-scored structured behavioural interviews for hiring and internal promotion. Candidates answer asynchronously by audio, video or text. Their answers are transcribed, and NLP models look for work-related behaviours and score them against a skills rubric; the method is described in Knockri's patent WO2022251970. The output is a score for each skill, a breakdown of the behaviours shown and a ranked shortlist. Pricing is published, starting at $799 a month billed annually. Knockri integrates with Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, iCIMS, Greenhouse and other applicant tracking systems, and it has worked with Canadian federal departments, including National Defence and the Treasury Board Secretariat. Since 2025 it has built agent workflows and governance on IBM watsonx. Knockri now says it scores transcripts only and uses no non-verbal or emotional cues. That is a change: in 2020 The Globe and Mail reported that the software also analysed facial expressions and was trained on videos scored by client recruiters.

Regulatory exposure

Knockri's scores and ranked shortlists are used to screen candidates. That makes it an automated employment decision tool under NYC Local Law 144 whenever an employer uses it for NYC roles, yet no independent bias audit or published summary could be found. The gap matters more now that DCWP has committed to tougher enforcement after the December 2025 State Comptroller audit. Under the EU AI Act it is a high-risk Annex III point 4 system, and Knockri hosts services in the EU. The Digital AI Omnibus moved those obligations to 2 December 2027. Scoring transcripts only should keep Knockri outside the Article 5(1)(f) ban on workplace emotion recognition. Given the 2020 reporting, though, deployers should get written confirmation that no visual or vocal features are used, including in the proctoring 'Trust Score'. In Illinois, employers that collect video answers fall under the AI Video Interview Act (notice, an explanation of how the AI works, consent, deletion on request) and HB 3773's notice duty, in force since 1 January 2026. Colorado's SB 26-189 disclosure rules start on 1 January 2027. California's FEHA rules require keeping automated-decision records for four years. Knockri has no default retention schedule and keeps data until the employer or the candidate asks for a purge, so deployers must set retention for each jurisdiction themselves. In Canada, the Treasury Board Secretariat's published Algorithmic Impact Assessment rated its Knockri pilot at Impact Level 1 under the Directive on Automated Decision-Making.

Path to a higher score

The biggest gain would come from bias-audit transparency. Knockri should commission an independent audit in Local Law 144 format, with impact ratios by sex, race/ethnicity and intersectional groups. It should publish that audit together with the adverse-impact and validation findings that currently sit behind a lead form on its reports page. It should also publish a system card and instructions for use. These would cover the speech-to-text step, the behaviour classifiers, rubric scoring, the LLM summaries and the inputs to the Trust Score, along with known limits such as transcription errors for accents or speech differences. An EU AI Act deployer pack with a FRIA template could build on its work on the Treasury Board AIA. On governance, it should link the Drata-hosted trust center at trust.knockri.com from its security page. It should also update that page and the privacy notice with its ISO/IEC 27001:2022 status, the EU-US Data Privacy Framework in place of Privacy Shield, a subprocessor list, a DPA, a default retention schedule, and a statement on whether customer data trains its models. Finally, it should switch on its inactive Statuspage, publish a log of model changes, and document safeguards for the option that sends interview invitations by score rank.

Regulatory frame

What applies to video interview AI.

The most heavily-regulated category. NYC LL 144 has applied since 2023; EU AI Act Annex III §4 treats the assessment layer as high-risk; Mobley v. Workday is shaping vendor-liability case-law here.

Ranking

Others rated in Video interview AI

Ranked 21 of 57 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.

  1. #18VidCruiter48F
  2. #19Crosschq47F
  3. #20Interviewer.AI47F
  4. #21KnockriThis profile47F
  5. #22TestGorilla47F
  6. #23HackerEarth46F
All video interview vendors

Conflicts of interest

No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.

Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.