HomeVendorsKnockri
Profile · Vendor·Video interviewAssessment

Knockri

Knockri runs asynchronous structured behavioural interviews that candidates answer by audio, video or text; it transcribes the answers, uses NLP models to score the work-related behaviours they describe against a skills framework, and produces per-skill scores and ranked shortlists.

HireAIScore rates Knockri 47 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed September 25, 2026. Knockri ranks 21 of 57 vendors rated in Video interview AI, against a category average of 44. That score is drawn from 41 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for Knockri — 36 with a cited source, 5 recording that nothing was located.

§ 01 - Company facts

Legal name
Knockri Inc.
Founded
2017
Headquarters
Canada · CA
Pricing tier
Mid
Market side
Employer-side (AEDT)
Categories
Video interviewAssessment
Website
knockri.com

These are company details, not findings. They are editable by a verified representative and carry no weight in the score, which is built only from the cited evidence below.

§ 02 - Score breakdown

§ Score breakdown

Category scoring

Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.

  1. 01

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Weight 20%

    55

    +11.0 · category avg 46

  2. 02

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Weight 18%

    35

    +6.3 · category avg 38

  3. 03

    FRIA Support

    Weight 15%

    35

    +5.3 · category avg 30

  4. 04

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Weight 15%

    55

    +8.3 · category avg 51

  5. 05

    Human Oversight Design

    Weight 12%

    60

    +7.2 · category avg 56

  6. 06

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Weight 12%

    35

    +4.2 · category avg 37

  7. 07

    Customer Documentation

    Weight 8%

    55

    +4.4 · category avg 56

Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 57 Video interview AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.

Total weighted score: 46.6(rounded to 47 for display)

§ 03 - Strongest · weakest

Strongest category

Human Oversight Design

Raw score 60 · contributes 7.2 to total.

60 against a 56 category average

Weakest category

Post-Market Monitoring

Raw score 35 · contributes 4.2 to total.

35 against a 37 category average

§ 04 - Cited evidence

Download diligence record→

§ Evidence

Cited per category

Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence.

Evidence ledger

Items
41
Documentation
27
Public statement
7
Product feature
2
Absence
5
With a source URL
36 of 41
Source hostnames
8
Fewest items
4
FRIA Support

These figures measure how thoroughly Knockri was reviewed, not how Knockri performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.

Article 11 Technical Documentation

7 items55
  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Knockri's Ethical AI page is a single-paragraph statement of principles (transparency, careful data selection, bias reduction, verification and validation) with no model documentation, governance structure or policy detail.

    https://knockri.com/ethical-ai/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The science page works as an explainability statement: it says the models analyse only the interview transcript with NLP, detect no non-verbal or emotional cues, and avoid the practice of training on human evaluators' interview ratings.

    https://knockri.com/science-and-dei/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Knockri's PCT application 'System and method for behavioral attribute measurement' (published 8 December 2022) discloses the method: responses are converted to text, transformer language models such as BERT or RoBERTa are fine-tuned on human-annotated behaviour data, and standardised scores are converted to percentiles to rank applicants.

    https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2022251970A1/en

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The Treasury Board Secretariat's Algorithmic Impact Assessment of its Knockri pilot (published February 2024) explains the scoring in plain language: audio is transcribed, an NLP model flags work behaviours, each question's score is the share of rubric behaviours present and the overall score is their average; it also says the production models are static, the algorithm is a trade secret and Knockri's technical documentation went to TBS rather than being published.

    https://open.canada.ca/data/en/info/52b8574d-5c95-463b-b375-8edd092cea30

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The reports page offers the white papers 'The Science of Knockri's AI-Based Selection Procedures' and 'The Knockri Approach to Legal Defensibility', but each 'Get The Report' button leads to a lead-capture form rather than a public download.

    https://knockri.com/reports/

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    IBM's May 2026 case study says Knockri uses traditional machine learning for scoring and classification, uses LLMs for summarization, interpretation, orchestration and candidate support, and governs both through watsonx.governance.

    https://www.ibm.com/new/product-blog/how-knockri-scaled-structured-hiring-with-ibm-watsonx

  • AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    No model or system card, instructions-for-use document, ISO/IEC 42001 certification or downloadable technical documentation pack was found on the knockri.com sitemap pages (ethical-ai, science-and-dei, security, reports, privacy and product pages) or in web searches. Knockri also runs a Drata trust center at trust.knockri.com that is not linked from its site; it sits behind a Cloudflare bot challenge, so its contents could not be reviewed for this assessment.

    Have a URL that disputes this?→

Bias Audit Transparency

5 items35
  • AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    No NYC Local Law 144 bias-audit summary or independent audit (BABL AI, DCI, ORCAA, Warden AI, Holistic AI, Credo AI) was found on any knockri.com sitemap page (including the security, science, reports and FAQ pages), in web searches pairing Knockri with 'bias audit', 'Local Law 144' and 'AEDT', or at trust.warden-ai.com/knockri (404). Knockri also runs a Drata trust center at trust.knockri.com that is not linked from its site; it sits behind a Cloudflare bot challenge, so its contents could not be reviewed for this assessment.

    Have a URL that disputes this?→

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The TBS Algorithmic Impact Assessment says Knockri gave TBS documentation showing that its behavioural predictions perform equally across demographic groups and that its transcription error rates beat industry guidelines, but answers 'No' when asked whether the bias-testing information is publicly available.

    https://open.canada.ca/data/en/info/52b8574d-5c95-463b-b375-8edd092cea30

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Knockri's report on adverse impact and its content and criterion-related validation studies sits behind a lead form, and the page shows no figures.

    https://knockri.com/the-knocki-approach-to-legal-defensibility/

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Knockri describes an 842-participant study, run with Virginia Tech's Louis Hickman and presented at SIOP, that relates its automated scores to rated personality, cognitive ability, GPA and hireability; the write-up reports no subgroup or adverse-impact results.

    https://knockri.com/blog/recruiting-tools/siop-annual-conference/

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The Globe and Mail reported on 3 January 2020 that Knockri's software also analysed facial expressions and had been trained on applicant videos scored by client recruiters, which differs from Knockri's current transcript-only description; no independent audit has verified the current design.

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-canadian-employers-turn-to-ai-to-analyze-video-interviews-of-job/

FRIA Support

4 items35

Data Governance Disclosure

7 items55
  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Says scoring analyses only the interview transcript and detects no non-verbal or emotional cues, and that race, gender, age, ethnicity, accent, appearance and sexual preference do not contribute to a score.

    https://knockri.com/science-and-dei/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Knockri's patent describes its training data as interview transcripts labelled for work behaviours by at least two human annotators, with disagreements settled by subject-matter experts, using a behaviour taxonomy adapted from the O*NET work-activity framework.

    https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2022251970A1/en

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The candidate FAQ lists the data stored (name, email, phone number, and video, audio or text responses) and says it is kept until the employer instructs a purge or the candidate asks for deletion, with no default retention period.

    https://knockri.com/candidate-faq/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The security page claims ISO 27001:2013 certification (an edition since replaced by ISO/IEC 27001:2022), describes GDPR measures, and lists data Knockri does not collect, such as health, financial, date-of-birth and government-ID data.

    https://knockri.com/security/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The privacy notice (updated 26 February 2025) says services are hosted in the USA, Canada and the EU and relies on Standard Contractual Clauses, but it still cites the invalidated Privacy Shield framework, ties candidate-data retention to customer agreements and does not say whether candidate responses are used to train models.

    https://knockri.com/privacy/

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Knockri announced a SOC 2 Type II examination in February 2023 without naming the audit firm.

    https://knockri.com/blog/press/knockri-achieves-soc-2-type-2-certification/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The homepage FAQ says every candidate gets a proctoring 'Trust Score' that estimates the likelihood of cheating using active proctoring and 'AI-driven classifiers', but it does not say which signals feed the score.

    https://knockri.com/

Human Oversight Design

5 items60
  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Scores are broken down by skill and behaviour so recruiters can see 'the rationale behind the score', and shortlists can be filtered by overall score or by individual skill.

    https://knockri.com/shortlisting-transparent-scoring/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The candidate FAQ says employers can set responses to be scored by AI or reviewed by their talent team, and that 'final decisions are always made by people, not AI'.

    https://knockri.com/candidate-faq/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    TBS's AIA reports that the system allows human overrides and logs them, keeps an audit trail naming the model version behind each result, can give reasons, and gives HR a Behaviour Insight report of behaviours shown and missed plus the audio of every response.

    https://open.canada.ca/data/en/info/52b8574d-5c95-463b-b375-8edd092cea30

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    A 'bias filter' lets recruiters view candidate results by ID rather than by name.

    https://knockri.com/fair-hiring/

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The behavioural-assessments page says recruiters can 'automatically send invites to schedule interviews based on the rank order of top scoring candidates', an option that lets the score alone trigger the next-stage invitation.

    https://knockri.com/behavioural-assessments/

Post-Market Monitoring

5 items35

Customer Documentation

8 items55
  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    A detailed candidate FAQ, also available in French, covers what is assessed, AI versus human review, the data stored, retention, accommodations and 24/7 support.

    https://knockri.com/candidate-faq/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The product overview describes building assessments from video, audio or written questions, giving accommodations and extensions, and scoring candidates against a customised skills framework with questions vetted by an I/O psychologist.

    https://knockri.com/product-overview/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Pricing is public: Growth costs $799 a month and Business $2,499 a month, both billed annually and covering 2,500 and 10,000 AI-evaluated interviews a year, while Enterprise is priced on request.

    https://knockri.com/pricing/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    A public Jira Service Management help centre hosts Candidate Care resources and a Recruiter Support portal.

    https://knockri.atlassian.net/servicedesk/customer/portals

  • Product featureCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The integrations page shows connectors for Workday, SAP, Oracle, iCIMS, Greenhouse, ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR and Avature, including bulk invites and data import and export.

    https://knockri.com/integrations/

  • Product featureCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Since May 2022 Knockri's behavioural video assessment has been listed on the SAP Store with integration into SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

    https://knockri.com/blog/press-releases/knockri-now-available-on-sap-store/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The Fair Hiring page links to the form-gated reports and still shows a placeholder case-study teaser reading 'increase racial & gender diversity by XX%'.

    https://knockri.com/fair-hiring/

  • AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    No public DPA, subprocessor list, guidance for deployers on NYC Local Law 144 or the Illinois AI Video Interview Act, candidate-notice templates or EU AI Act deployer documentation was found on any knockri.com sitemap page.

    Have a URL that disputes this?→

§ 05 - Editorial notes

§ Regulatory frame

§ Others rated in Video interview AI

All video interview vendors→

Ranked 21 of 57 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.

  1. 18VidCruiter48F
  2. 19Crosschq47F
  3. 20Interviewer.AI47F
  4. 21KnockriThis profile47F
  5. 22TestGorilla47F
  6. 23HackerEarth46F

Conflicts of interest

No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.

Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.