Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Interviewer.AI vs Knockri
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
Knockri
Knockri runs asynchronous structured behavioural interviews that candidates answer by audio, video or text; it transcribes the answers, uses NLP models to score the work-related behaviours they describe against a skills framework, and produces per-skill scores and ranked shortlists.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
Interviewer.AI and Knockri tie at 47.
Interviewer.AI and Knockri, both in the Video interview cohort, tie at 47 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Interviewer.AI leads 2 of the 7 criteria and Knockri 2, with 3 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Interviewer.AI 60, Knockri 55 — and at a 15% weight it carries 76% of the weighted advantage Interviewer.AI holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Interviewer.AI2
- Knockri2
- Level3
- Widest raw gap
- Data Governance Disclosure60 vs 55
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data Governance Disclosure15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Interviewer.AI and Knockri are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Interviewer.AI | Knockri |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | CA |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight38% of the movement so far
Interviewer.AI60Knockri550.8 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight69% of the movement so far
Interviewer.AI52Knockri550.6 weighted points to Knockri
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight88% of the movement so far
Interviewer.AI32Knockri350.4 weighted points to Knockri
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Interviewer.AI58Knockri550.2 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to 0.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 1.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that 0.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Interviewer.AI minus Knockri, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Knockri | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 35 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 47F | - | 0.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Knockri | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 36 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Knockri has 41 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Knockri sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain, and 41 for Knockri, across 7 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Knockri last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.