Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs myInterview
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
4 points separate Harri and myInterview.
Harri (ATS-integrated) edges myInterview (Video interview) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 41 to 37. myInterview takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 5 for Harri, whose share includes FRIA Support. Customer Documentation is the widest raw gap (Harri 60, myInterview 40) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is FRIA Support at 15% (Harri 44, myInterview 25), 39% of the weighted advantage Harri builds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri5
- myInterview2
- Widest raw gap
- Customer Documentation60 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only myInterview is in scope of
| Record | Harri | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight28% of the movement so far
Harri44myInterview252.9 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight51% of the movement so far
Harri22myInterview352.3 weighted points to myInterview
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight67% of the movement so far
Harri60myInterview401.6 weighted points to Harri
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight81% of the movement so far
Harri52myInterview421.5 weighted points to Harri
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight89% of the movement so far
Harri40myInterview330.8 weighted points to Harri
- 6
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight95% of the movement so far
Harri35myInterview380.6 weighted points to myInterview
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri52myInterview480.5 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +4.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus myInterview, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 25 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 42 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 48 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 33 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 37F | +4 | +4.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 40 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.