Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs Pulsifi
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
Harri leads Pulsifi by 8 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Harri, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 41 and Pulsifi, filed under Assessment, on 33, 8 points apart. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Harri: Harri is ahead on FRIA Support and Pulsifi on Human Oversight Design. The advantage Harri holds is spread out: FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Harri 44, Pulsifi 25, 15% weight), yet it supplies only 33% of the weighted points Harri gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri6
- Pulsifi1
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support44 vs 25
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only Pulsifi is in scope of
| Record | Harri | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight32% of the movement so far
Harri44Pulsifi252.9 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight52% of the movement so far
Harri52Pulsifi401.8 weighted points to Harri
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight68% of the movement so far
Harri40Pulsifi281.4 weighted points to Harri
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight81% of the movement so far
Harri60Pulsifi461.1 weighted points to Harri
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight92% of the movement so far
Harri35Pulsifi301.0 weighted points to Harri
- 6
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight96% of the movement so far
Harri22Pulsifi200.4 weighted points to Harri
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri52Pulsifi550.4 weighted points to Pulsifi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +8.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +8.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus Pulsifi, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 20 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 25 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 40 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 28 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 46 | +14 | +1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 33F | +8 | +8.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.