Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs Willo
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Willo
Willo is a browser-based asynchronous (one-way) video interview platform that lets employers collect recorded video, audio, multiple-choice and written candidate responses, then uses AI to transcribe, summarize, rank candidates against employer-defined "Blueprint" criteria, and flag scripted or AI-generated answers.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
Harri and Willo tie at 41.
Harri (ATS-integrated) and Willo (Video interview) tie at 41 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Harri leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Willo 4, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, FRIA Support, is both the widest raw gap (Harri 44, Willo 25) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 15% weight it makes up 75% of the weighted advantage Harri holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri3
- Willo4
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support44 vs 25
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only Willo is in scope of
| Record | Harri | Willo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight40% of the movement so far
Harri44Willo252.9 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight60% of the movement so far
Harri22Willo301.4 weighted points to Willo
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight76% of the movement so far
Harri52Willo621.2 weighted points to Willo
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight85% of the movement so far
Harri35Willo380.6 weighted points to Willo
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight91% of the movement so far
Harri40Willo360.5 weighted points to Harri
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight98% of the movement so far
Harri60Willo540.5 weighted points to Harri
- 7
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri52Willo530.1 weighted points to Willo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus Willo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | Willo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 25 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 53 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 62 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 36 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 54 | +6 | +0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 41F | - | +0.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | Willo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Willo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.