§ The result
Maki People leads Harver by 6 points.
Maki People scores 62 (D) and Harver 56 (F) under rubric v1.0 — a 6-point gap inside the Assessment cohort. Maki People leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including FRIA Support, while Harver leads 1, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 2 are level. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Harver 35, Maki People 57 — and at a 15% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Harver
Pre-employment assessment suite covering cognitive ability, behavioral, and situational judgement, including the legacy Pymetrics games product.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
Harver and Maki People are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Harver | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | NL | FR |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 46% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Harver 35 · Maki People 57
3.3 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Harver 40 · Maki People 52
1.4 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Harver 55 · Maki People 62
1.1 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Harver 60 · Maki People 70
0.8 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Harver 65 · Maki People 62
0.6 weighted points to Harver
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -6.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -6.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harver minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | Harver | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 62 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 80 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 57 | -22 | -3.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 62 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 70 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 62 (D) | -6 | -6.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harver | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 17 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; Maki People has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for Maki People, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harver last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next