§ The result
Harver leads Recruiterflow by 20 points.
Harver finishes 20 points clear of Recruiterflow under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 36 — across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Recruiterflow takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 6 for Harver, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Harver 80, Recruiterflow 18) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 53% of the weighted advantage Harver holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Harver
Pre-employment assessment suite covering cognitive ability, behavioral, and situational judgement, including the legacy Pymetrics games product.
Vendor profile
Recruiterflow
Recruiterflow is an ATS and CRM for recruiting agencies and executive search firms. Its AIRA AI layer ranks candidates already in a firm's database against each job with an explainable 0–100 Criteria Score (AIRA Matchmaker, shown as the 'AI Matches' card), and adds natural-language candidate search, external profile sourcing and an AI call notetaker that fills in interview scorecards.
§ The record
Harver is filed under Assessment AI, Recruiterflow under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Harver is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Harver | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Harver 80 · Recruiterflow 18
11.2 weighted points to Harver
20% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Harver 65 · Recruiterflow 33
6.4 weighted points to Harver
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Harver 55 · Recruiterflow 44
1.6 weighted points to Harver
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Harver 50 · Recruiterflow 58
1.0 weighted points to Recruiterflow
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Harver 40 · Recruiterflow 33
0.8 weighted points to Harver
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Harver 35 · Recruiterflow 30
0.8 weighted points to Harver
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Harver 60 · Recruiterflow 56
0.3 weighted points to Harver
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +20.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +20 beside that +20.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harver minus Recruiterflow.
| Category | Weight | Harver | Recruiterflow | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 33 | +32 | +6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 18 | +62 | +11.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 44 | +11 | +1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 58 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 33 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 56 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 36 (F) | +20 | +20.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harver | Recruiterflow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; Recruiterflow has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for Recruiterflow, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harver last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruiterflow last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next