HomeCompareHarver vs Recruitly

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Harver vs Recruitly

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Harver leads Recruitly by 15 points.

Harver finishes 15 points clear of Recruitly under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 41 — across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Recruitly takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 4 for Harver, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Harver 80, Recruitly 15) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 67% of the weighted advantage Harver holds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Harver is filed under Assessment AI, Recruitly under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Harver is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHarverRecruitly
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersNLAE
Founded20152015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 61% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Harver 80 · Recruitly 15

    11.7 weighted points to Harver

  2. 20% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Harver 65 · Recruitly 45

    4.0 weighted points to Harver

  3. 15% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Harver 55 · Recruitly 45

    1.5 weighted points to Harver

  4. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Harver 50 · Recruitly 60

    1.2 weighted points to Recruitly

  5. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Harver 40 · Recruitly 45

    0.6 weighted points to Recruitly

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Harver 60 · Recruitly 58

    0.2 weighted points to Harver

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +15.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +15 beside that +15.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Harver minus Recruitly.

CategoryWeightHarverRecruitlyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6545+20+4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%8015+65+11.7
FRIA Support15%3535--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5545+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5060-10-1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4045-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%56 (F)41 (F)+15+15.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHarverRecruitly
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%10Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%10—60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%10Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%100Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain325Sources on the vendor's own domain

Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; Recruitly has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Recruitly, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Harver last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitly last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.