HomeCompareHarver vs SEEK

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Harver vs SEEK

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Harver takes the total, SEEK takes more of the criteria.

Harver holds a 2-point edge over SEEK under rubric v1.0, 56 to 54, across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. SEEK leads more of the criteria, 5 against 2 for Harver, yet Harver takes Bias Audit Transparency, which carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Harver 80, SEEK 40 — and at an 18% weight it carries 94% of the weighted advantage Harver holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Harver is filed under Assessment AI, SEEK under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Harver is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHarverSEEK
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersNLAU
Founded20151997

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Harver 80 · SEEK 40

    7.2 weighted points to Harver

  2. 12% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Harver 50 · SEEK 62

    1.4 weighted points to SEEK

  3. 12% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Harver 40 · SEEK 50

    1.2 weighted points to SEEK

  4. 20% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Harver 65 · SEEK 70

    1.0 weighted points to SEEK

  5. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Harver 55 · SEEK 60

    0.8 weighted points to SEEK

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Harver 35 · SEEK 32

    0.4 weighted points to Harver

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Harver 60 · SEEK 64

    0.3 weighted points to SEEK

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +2.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +2.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Harver minus SEEK.

CategoryWeightHarverSEEKΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6570-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%8040+40+7.2
FRIA Support15%3532+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5560-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5062-12-1.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4050-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%6064-4-0.3
Total100%56 (F)54 (F)+2+2.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHarverSEEK
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%10Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%10—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%10Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%100Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain237Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; SEEK has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SEEK sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 40 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain, and 30 for SEEK, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Harver last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SEEK last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.