HomeCompareHarver vs Zoho Recruit

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Harver vs Zoho Recruit

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Harver leads Zoho Recruit on 3 of the 7 criteria.

Harver sits 14 points above Zoho Recruit under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 42 — with Harver filed under Assessment and Zoho Recruit under ATS-integrated. Harver leads 3 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 4 are level, so Zoho Recruit is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 3 Harver leads is FRIA Support, Harver 35 to Zoho Recruit 30. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Harver 80, Zoho Recruit 24 — and at an 18% weight it carries 68% of the weighted advantage Harver holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Harver is filed under Assessment AI, Zoho Recruit under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHarverZoho Recruit
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersNLIN
Founded20151996

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Harver 80 · Zoho Recruit 24

    10.1 weighted points to Harver

  2. 20% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Harver 65 · Zoho Recruit 45

    4.0 weighted points to Harver

  3. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Harver 35 · Zoho Recruit 30

    0.8 weighted points to Harver

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 3 figures above sum to +14.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +14 beside that +14.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Harver minus Zoho Recruit.

CategoryWeightHarverZoho RecruitΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6545+20+4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%8024+56+10.1
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5555--
Human Oversight Design12%5050--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4040--
Customer Documentation8%6060--
Total100%56 (F)42 (F)+14+14.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHarverZoho Recruit
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%10Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%1011Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%10Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%100Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain107Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; Zoho Recruit has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 27 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Zoho Recruit, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Harver last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Zoho Recruit last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.