§ The result
HiBob leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, HiBob (ATS-integrated) opens a 16-point lead on HeroHunt.ai (Sourcing), 46 to 30. HiBob takes all 7 criteria and HeroHunt.ai none of them; the nearest contest is FRIA Support, HeroHunt.ai 27 to HiBob 35. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeroHunt.ai 20, HiBob 55 — and at a 20% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage HiBob holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
HiBob
HiBob's Bob is an all-in-one HR platform whose Bob Hiring applicant tracking module uses AI to give each application an explainable match score against recruiter-defined criteria (AI CV Matching) and to draft job descriptions, interview scorecards and candidate emails.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HiBob under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | HiBob |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | GB |
| Founded | 2021 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · HiBob 55
7.0 weighted points to HiBob
12% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · HiBob 47
2.3 weighted points to HiBob
18% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · HiBob 20
1.8 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · HiBob 57
1.8 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · HiBob 35
1.2 weighted points to HiBob
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · HiBob 61
1.0 weighted points to HiBob
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · HiBob 63
1.0 weighted points to HiBob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -16.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus HiBob.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | HiBob | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 55 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 20 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 35 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 57 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 63 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 47 | -19 | -2.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 61 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 46 (F) | -16 | -16.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | HiBob | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HiBob has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 36 for HiBob, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiBob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next