§ The result
Hireology leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
Hireology (ATS-integrated) and HeroHunt.ai (Sourcing) are 27 points apart under rubric v1.0, 57 for Hireology against 30 for HeroHunt.ai. HeroHunt.ai leads none of the 7 criteria, and Hireology is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeroHunt.ai 10, Hireology 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage Hireology holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Hireology
Hireology is an applicant tracking and hiring platform for multi-location auto dealers, healthcare providers and hospitality operators. Its AI features score applicants against employer-defined criteria (AI Match) and run rubric-scored, voice-based first-round screening interviews (AI Interview).
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Hireology under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Hireology |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2010 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Hireology 83
13.1 weighted points to Hireology
20% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Hireology 50
6.0 weighted points to Hireology
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Hireology 59
3.7 weighted points to Hireology
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Hireology 35
1.2 weighted points to Hireology
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Hireology 52
1.1 weighted points to Hireology
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · Hireology 58
0.8 weighted points to Hireology
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · Hireology 57
0.2 weighted points to Hireology
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -26.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -27 beside that -26.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Hireology.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Hireology | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 50 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 83 | -73 | -13.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 35 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 52 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 57 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 59 | -31 | -3.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 57 (F) | -27 | -26.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Hireology | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Hireology has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai and Hireology sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 29 for Hireology, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Hireology last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next