§ The result
Humanly leads HeroHunt.ai by 12 points.
Humanly, filed under Screening, comes out 12 points above HeroHunt.ai, filed under Sourcing: 42 against 30 under rubric v1.0. Humanly leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while HeroHunt.ai leads 1, including Data Governance Disclosure. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeroHunt.ai 10, Humanly 40 — and at an 18% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Humanly holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Humanly under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Humanly is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Humanly |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Humanly 40
5.4 weighted points to Humanly
20% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Humanly 45
5.0 weighted points to Humanly
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Humanly 35
1.2 weighted points to Humanly
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Humanly 40
0.8 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · Humanly 58
0.4 weighted points to Humanly
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · Humanly 52
0.3 weighted points to Humanly
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Humanly 30
0.2 weighted points to Humanly
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -11.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Humanly.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Humanly | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 45 | -25 | -5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 40 | -30 | -5.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 35 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 40 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 52 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 42 (F) | -12 | -11.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Humanly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Humanly last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next