§ The result
Jack & Jill leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
The Sourcing cohort pairing of Jack & Jill and HeroHunt.ai comes out 49 to 30 under rubric v1.0, a 19-point lead for Jack & Jill. Jack & Jill leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; HeroHunt.ai leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HeroHunt.ai 10, Jack & Jill 62) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 52% of the weighted advantage Jack & Jill holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Jack & Jill
Jack & Jill is a London AI recruiting marketplace. Its free career agent, Jack, interviews and profiles candidates, and its employer-side AI recruiter, Jill, turns a role brief into a scoring rubric, ranks candidates from Jack's network (and optionally public profiles) with a percentage match, and arranges introductions only when both sides agree.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai and Jack & Jill are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Jack & Jill |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | GB |
| Founded | 2021 | 2025 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Jack & Jill 62
9.4 weighted points to Jack & Jill
20% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Jack & Jill 44
4.8 weighted points to Jack & Jill
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Jack & Jill 48
2.4 weighted points to Jack & Jill
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · Jack & Jill 56
0.6 weighted points to Jack & Jill
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Jack & Jill 48
0.4 weighted points to Jack & Jill
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · Jack & Jill 58
0.4 weighted points to Jack & Jill
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Jack & Jill 28
0.1 weighted points to Jack & Jill
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -18.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Jack & Jill.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Jack & Jill | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 44 | -24 | -4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 62 | -52 | -9.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 28 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 48 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 48 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 56 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 49 (F) | -19 | -18.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Jack & Jill | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 6 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 31 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Jack & Jill has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai and Jack & Jill sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 36 for Jack & Jill, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jack & Jill last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next