§ The result
JazzHR leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
JazzHR sits 14 points above HeroHunt.ai under rubric v1.0 — 44 against 30 — with JazzHR filed under ATS-integrated and HeroHunt.ai under Sourcing. JazzHR leads every one of the 7 criteria, HeroHunt.ai none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, HeroHunt.ai 27 to JazzHR 28. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HeroHunt.ai 20, JazzHR 45, 20% weight), is only 37% of the weighted advantage JazzHR builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
JazzHR
JazzHR is a small-business applicant tracking system that manages job posting, applications and hiring workflows, and layers on AI "Talent Fit" scoring that ranks candidates against a job description plus automated knockout screening questions.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, JazzHR under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | JazzHR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2009 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · JazzHR 45
5.0 weighted points to JazzHR
18% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · JazzHR 35
4.5 weighted points to JazzHR
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · JazzHR 42
1.7 weighted points to JazzHR
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · JazzHR 52
1.1 weighted points to JazzHR
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · JazzHR 56
0.6 weighted points to JazzHR
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · JazzHR 58
0.4 weighted points to JazzHR
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · JazzHR 28
0.1 weighted points to JazzHR
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -13.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus JazzHR.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | JazzHR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 45 | -25 | -5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 35 | -25 | -4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 28 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 52 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 42 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 56 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 44 (F) | -14 | -13.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | JazzHR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 17 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; JazzHR has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai and JazzHR sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 24 for JazzHR, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JazzHR last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next