§ The result
Jobylon leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
Jobylon finishes 18 points clear of HeroHunt.ai under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 30 — across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Jobylon takes all 7 criteria and HeroHunt.ai none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, HeroHunt.ai 55 to Jobylon 60. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (HeroHunt.ai 20, Jobylon 55) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 41% of the weighted advantage Jobylon holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Jobylon
Jobylon is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking system and talent CRM for enterprise employers whose optional AI features score each applicant's CV against the job description, suggest existing candidates for other open roles, draft job ads and screening questions, and run candidate screening and interview scheduling over WhatsApp, SMS and email.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Jobylon under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Jobylon |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | SE |
| Founded | 2021 | 2011 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Jobylon 55
7.0 weighted points to Jobylon
18% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Jobylon 28
3.2 weighted points to Jobylon
12% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Jobylon 45
2.0 weighted points to Jobylon
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Jobylon 58
1.9 weighted points to Jobylon
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Jobylon 36
1.3 weighted points to Jobylon
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · Jobylon 60
1.0 weighted points to Jobylon
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · Jobylon 60
0.6 weighted points to Jobylon
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Jobylon.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Jobylon | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 55 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 28 | -18 | -3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 36 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 45 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 48 (F) | -18 | -17.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Jobylon | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobylon last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next