§ The result
Tenzo AI leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 26 points between Tenzo AI (Screening) and HeroHunt.ai (Sourcing): 56 for Tenzo AI, 30 for HeroHunt.ai. Tenzo AI takes all 7 criteria and HeroHunt.ai none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, HeroHunt.ai 55 to Tenzo AI 60. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HeroHunt.ai 10, Tenzo AI 83) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 52% of the weighted advantage Tenzo AI holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Tenzo AI
Tenzo AI's AI recruiter, Morgan, screens and interviews applicants by phone, SMS, email, WhatsApp or video in 40+ languages, scores them against employer-defined rubrics with fraud and identity checks, schedules next rounds, and writes scores, transcripts and recordings back to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Tenzo AI under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Tenzo AI is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Tenzo AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Tenzo AI 83
13.1 weighted points to Tenzo AI
20% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Tenzo AI 45
5.0 weighted points to Tenzo AI
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Tenzo AI 45
2.0 weighted points to Tenzo AI
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Tenzo AI 40
1.9 weighted points to Tenzo AI
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Tenzo AI 55
1.5 weighted points to Tenzo AI
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · Tenzo AI 62
1.1 weighted points to Tenzo AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · Tenzo AI 60
0.6 weighted points to Tenzo AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -25.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -26 beside that -25.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Tenzo AI.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Tenzo AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 45 | -25 | -5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 83 | -73 | -13.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 40 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 45 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 62 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 56 (F) | -26 | -25.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Tenzo AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Tenzo AI has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai and Tenzo AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 34 for Tenzo AI, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tenzo AI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next